Talk:The Hound of the Baskervilles (2000 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Critique of Frewer's performance[edit]

In the entry, it's stated that Frewer's portrayal is "lifeless." Having just watched this version, I can only say that the entry's author never saw this version. In fact, Frewer's effervescence is nearly off-putting.

The so-called "References" at the end of the entry ---

The first one NEVER uses the term "lifeless," instead, he says that, to him, either Frewer or the director do not seem sure how to play Sherlock. What he says about Frewer's portrayal is anything BUT "lifeless."

The link to the second one results in an error stating that the page cannot be found and no longer exists.

As such, the use of the word "lifeless" is probably the entry's author's OWN opinion that is not supported by anything.

Therefore, I think that that sentence should be removed from the entry. 68.231.71.119 (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that someone slipped the word "lifeless" into the existing sentence about criticism which would explain why the references don't make this assertion. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Hound of the Baskervilles (2000 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Production and Reception Section, March 2018[edit]

Hello Wikipedians! I am a student working on this Wikipedia page for a university project. I have already added a few of my sources and sentences from my sandbox to the page. Feel free to take a look at what I'm going to add! I plan to add to the production tab and the reception tab as well as edit and add to the infobox. All of my sources are from my university's database and will be using APA citation. If anyone has any questions, feel free to reach out to me. Cheers! GeekChic710 (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Montacute House as Baskerville Hall[edit]

While the Production section states that a facade for Baskerville Hall was constructed, there are long shots of Baskerville Hall that are clearly of Montacute House in Somerset, England. That can be seen by comparison with images in Google Maps. (And IMDb gives Montacute House as a filming location.) So I have added that to the section. BMJ-pdx (talk) 01:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IMDB is not a reliable source and the link you added as a reference is dead. I searched for an archived link and found it only says "The Hound of the Baskervilles (2000) Montacute House" which doesn't reference your claim that it was used for long shots or for Baskerville Hall. I have reverted your edit. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 22:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]