Talk:Scaramouche

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

re : The character was invented by a 17th century Italian actor, Tiberio Fiorelli.

A 16th century drawing by Leonardo da Vinci "A Grotesque Head" is believed by some to be the portrait of Scaramuccia, a Gypsy chieftain - although there is no proof the it was indeed the subject of the drawing it would suggest that Scaramuccia was well-known at least as far back as the 16th century 77.194.112.91 20:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 09:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


ScaramucciaScaramouche — While the stock character is originally known as "Scaramuccia" in Italian, in English the character is primarily known as "Scaramouche" by way of French. Moreover, the character is clearly the primary usage of the term "Scaramouche"; the novel is about a person who portrays the Scaramouche character. Per the usual rules on the primary English usage, Scaramouche should be the page about the character. Gavia immer (talk) 02:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Scaramouche in the Arts[edit]

Figaro and Leporello as personifications of Scaramouche ? 80.111.101.119 (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Character section - How does Coviello relate?[edit]

The character section suddenly starts talking about Rosa & Coviello - no links - no reference. Who are they? What do either have to do with Scaramouche? What does "like Scaramouche" mean in context? Very sloppy work!

If anyone can edit to make sense, please do. Otherwise, I propose the "Character" section be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grossmusic (talkcontribs) 17:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]