Talk:Saudi Arabia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Saudi Arabia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Saudi Arabia is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
|
Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove public execution, it's a myth and has no data backing it up. Don't like seeing myths and accusations on a site that's supposed to be a reliable and true source of information there are no public executions because they are no public ones, all just private in a room JohnGalt245 (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- There certainly have been, and I've added a citation to Amnesty International to back it up. I've modified the wording somewhat,since it doesn't necessarily reflect current practice, but it is not a myth. Acroterion (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under "Politics --> Human Rights", there is an error where a reference isn't completed.
"The justice system regularly engages in capital punishment, which has included public executions by beheading.[276]ref>"Rights group condemns Saudi beheadings". Associated Press. 14 October 2008. Retrieved 14 October 2008.</ref>"
An extra "<" is missing at the beginning of the 'ref' I think. 128.255.234.11 (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Wiki standards[edit]
English Wikipedia generally applies the transliteration and spelling standards developed by English-language scholars and academics. This is certainly the case with historical terms, while current terms may be spelled according to official policy in the respective country. The scholarly norms have evolved over time and are well founded.
The common academic name spelling in English requires the definite article (al, etc.) and "son of" (ibn) to be written small, unless it occurs at the beginning of a sentence. The article must be followed by a hyphen. Examples:
- Omar ibn al-Khattab, not Omar Ibn Al Khattab
- Dumat al-Jandal, not Dumat Al Jandal
I know some perceive it as irreverential, but it's not meant to be and it is the common practice. If administrative units (national governments, regional or municipal authorities) decree a different English spelling as normative, this concerns only the individual names to which the decrees apply, and the modern administrative units, not the historical or archaeological sites.
Thank you. Arminden (talk) 13:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Spelling[edit]
The banner used to be in British spelling but I changed it to British Oxford spelling since the majority of words with the ending ize/ise (izing/ising and ization/isation too) were already using the American/Oxford spelling, and I think enforcing the other variant would just lead to an inconsistent article, it also appears that the first version that's not a stub used the spellings "flavour" and "recognized" for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saudi_Arabia&oldid=1637856 Terbofast (talk) 07:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Iraq[edit]
3942€ Saudi Arabia is Islam ☪️ for the number93491333 And Of course we iraq — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.181.109.83 (talk) 18:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Oxford spelling
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Geography
- B-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Geography
- B-Class vital articles in Geography
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- B-Class Arab world articles
- Top-importance Arab world articles
- WikiProject Arab world articles
- B-Class Saudi Arabia articles
- Top-importance Saudi Arabia articles
- WikiProject Saudi Arabia articles
- B-Class Asia articles
- Top-importance Asia articles
- WikiProject Asia articles
- B-Class Western Asia articles
- Top-importance Western Asia articles
- WikiProject Western Asia articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions