Talk:Networker (train)

Trains: in UK / Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge[edit]

I've merged Turbo (BR train) into this article - most of the info was duplicated.FengRail (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph[edit]

Someone thinks that the photograph of the Class 365 'Networker Express' No. 365530 at Cambridge is also a Class 165 Network Turbo - this is incorrect and the photograph should be removed.

The Networker Express Class 365 are dual voltage four carriage EMUs, whilst the Networker Turbo Class 165 are diesel two and tree car DMUs.

--Peter Skuce (talk) 00:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted - I exchanged the picture for a real 165. Hope it wasn't me that made that mistake.

Main picture[edit]

Given that the trains were introduced by Network SouthEast, is it not better to have the header image as an NSE image? Just a thought - does anyone know of a good quality one? Turini2 (talk) 09:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]