Talk:Male infertility crisis

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2020.

Added additional content[edit]

Added new content with various sections. Usage of the term. History and development of the issue. Different viewpoints and responses.

Running4uni (talk) 02:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

China?[edit]

See also this FT report (alas, paywalled) about similar problems in China: https://www.ft.com/content/d4b5325c-abad-11e6-ba7d-76378e4fef24

This Newsweek article also mentions China and Japan, but without giving sources: https://www.newsweek.com/2017/09/22/male-infertility-crisis-experts-663074.html

-- The Anome (talk) 11:24, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Holy shit[edit]

Holy shit, you guys. Who wrote this article? They can’t possibly be a native English speaker. Subject/verb tense disagreements, tautologies, and unnecessary repetition abound. This whole thing is a friggin’ dumpster fire. It’s honestly so bad that I think it’s going to be the thing that finally spurs me to make an account and become a Wikipedia editor.

What the fuck do half these sentences even mean?? Additionally, lots of the assertions and statistics presented here are patently false (i.e., skewed in a way that minimizes the extent of the titular crisis).

How has this article remained so bad for so long?! The mind boggles.

Regards,

A Wikipedian now, I guess — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.15.33.139 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@107.15.33.139:: Your edits seem good (and are much appreciated) but why did you remove the references from that one statement? jp×g 03:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Sperme spermatogenèse délétionFertility2ComonsFL2.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

In response to the unnecessarily whiney comment above, I have gone through the article to reorganize ideas and correct grammar and syntax. A double-check is needed to ensure that the article flows more cleanly and that there is no abnormal grammar. I also noticed that this article lacks a standardized WP:ENGVAR (I'd recommend {{use British English}}), and cites non-WP:MEDRS. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]