This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
It appears to me that the article has been used as a pretext to advertise the "Gellish dictionary". And that is definitely wrong, because that "dictionary" of an artificial language has little to do with the kind of problems faced by compilers of machine dictionaries for real natural languages. It is disappointing that Wikipedia hosts a separate article on that and allows the author to spread his plugs throughout other articles, like this one. 193.0.65.67 (talk) 18:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]