This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
I am not sure what's going on here, but transforming an article to a redirect without discussion and consensus is against policies. I reverted such things many times in the past and I will continue.Biophys (talk) 03:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As a matter of fact it was created as a redirect, and it is a not a new article, just a copy paste from the article to which it was supposed to redirect. Clear issue of the Wikipedia:Content forking.--Lokyz (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strange question knowing that it was you who created the redirect [[1]]--Lokyz (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was a while ago. The subject is certainly notable and deserves its own subarticle; I see nothing wrong with replacing the redirect with an article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]