This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
I do feel that at least some of the members should be stated. At least the ones that have wiki pages. People coming to the page would want to know some of the important members of a federation of organizations. Perhaps not everyone, as that would be just a bunch of red links, but the ones that we already have pages on deserve at least a link.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I sort of hear you, but that is what their website is for. We already say that as of 1976 they had 54,000 members in 60 countries; this organization barely meets WP:NOTABILITY and I see no sense in trying to pad it with yet more content from their website. Jytdog (talk) 03:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How about we put the links under the "See also" heading?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 16:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
