Talk:I'm OK – You're OK

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OR in the Criticisms section[edit]

Ripped out quite a lot of OR rubbish from the criticsms section. ElectricRay (talk) 13:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


themes[edit]

I'm proposing to add a section describing the major themes to this book, and removing (for now) the elements of the current article that seem to make unsubstantiated POV judgements - any objections or anyone else working on this at the moment? Infilms (talk) 09:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'm done adding new material. I invite other editors who know this subject to improve this article further. Hugh Mason (talkcontribs 20:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't a person be referred to by his or her last name, as in Penfield for Wilder Penfield?[edit]

The subject line says it all. Just wondering why the author used the first name, Wilder, to refer to the neurosurgeon? (69.155.140.190 (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC))[reply]

POV issues[edit]

There's a clear "positive" bias in the language of this article, especially in the lead, and that's even allowing for the Criticism section. I've added CN for a couple of the more blatant examples (in the lead), but the whole thing could do with a clean up towards a more neutral tone. Thomask0 (talk) 03:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]