This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
Please re-read more carefully, there is no false information. The article does NOT say newer engines which meet current pollution standards are used, it says "a relatively new engine that met pollution standards when manufactured". The point is that the engine met standards when it was made and was retired prematurely due to the vehicle in which it was originally installed being "totaled". Installing it in a glider allows it to be used as was originally intended. Emission standards do not apply retroactively, and banning these engines from being used in glider trucks effectively removes engines from use just because the truck was involved in an accident. That denies to the owners of these engines the value they can derive from their investment. Your edits did not tell the entire story and was not neutral. MB 00:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, new chassis from certain truck manufactures are used, not just chassis from wrecks. Engines used are "pre-emission" standards. Source is the major glider truck manufacturer. User:Fred BauderTalk 07:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]