This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is written in Sri Lankan English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Hi @Викидим, I did see that, as I came here from following the Upcountry disambiguation page. The issue is that relative to the overall topic "Geography of Sri Lanka", the specific reference to uncountry is not particularly important, and in fact was the only bold in the whole paragraph. If there was a section of the article about the upcountry, I would support it being bolded there, but not in the lede when it creates a false sense of importance about that term. Alyo(chat·edits) 21:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have no strong opinion either way, so let's keep it as it was (no bold font). Once the section is in, redirect can be changed indeed. Викидим (talk) 21:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]