Talk:Emission computed tomography

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Emission computed tomography article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

BigAndi (talk · contribs)

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Emission computed tomography.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Expand the current stub?[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Per WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE.

I tried to expand the current stub with an introduction:

expanded version

Please check whether this is appropriate and accept or reject this request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigAndi (talk • contribs) 13:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 7-OCT-2019[edit]

Clarification requested

Part of the edit request process involves making the requisite disclosures regarding the nature of the COI. Specifically, if the COI editor receives, or expects to receive, compensation for any contribution they make, they must disclose their employer, client, and affiliation to comply with Wikipedia's terms of use and the policy on paid editing. Please advise by opening a new edit request when ready to proceed with your disclosure.

Regards, Spintendo 17:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first.

Sorry the tag was missing. BigAndi (talk) 20:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The tag has not been filled out correctly. The tag's |User1= parameter is blank. The COI editor has not stated whether or not they have been paid for the edits they are suggesting. if they have been paid, the tag's |U1-client= and |U1-employer= parameters need to be filled out, while the {{connected contributor (paid)}} template needs to be used. This information needs to be provided. Regards, Spintendo 13:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#BigAndi,_MrOllie_and_a_Springer_textbook

I've not had time to do anything here and I've been waiting for a response from MrOllie, but otherwise I'm inclined to re-add this source and do some expansion with it. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have not been paid to suggest this edit. I would also volunteer to do the expansion as suggested by Andy Dingley after the version is recovered. BigAndi (talk) 14:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll defer to Andy Dingley and Ollie's good judgement on this. @Andy Dingley: If you have no concerns regarding the request at Talk:Projection-slice_theorem#requestedit from this same editor, I would be happy to implement it. Please advise. Regards, Spintendo 05:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 23-OCT-2019[edit]

Request closed for inactivity

The above edit request has not received any non-COI editor responses for the past 2 weeks (15 days in total).
Discussion is often a key component to implementing edits, and requests may be adversely affected when they fail to garner input from a reviewing editor. In light of this — and as a safeguard — this request has been declined as needing discussion.
The COI editor is urged to revive stalled communications by making contact with local editors on those editor's own talk pages, and then by moving those discussions back to this talk page.
The COI editor may also wish to broadcast requests for edits at the talk pages of the WikiProjects which govern this article. Those projects are usually listed at the top of an article's talk page.
Unless being assisted by another review editor, the COI editor is asked to allow for a reasonable amount of time to pass before reactivating a subsequent {{request edit}} template covering the same request.

Regards, Spintendo 21:48, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]