Talk:Curriculum studies

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Curriculum studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your article's reliable sources are impeccableB.G. 06:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beagarci (talk • contribs)

Article Evaluation[edit] Article: Curriculum studies This article is flagged as having unclear sources and insufficient citations. There are only two items under content, not including "See also" and "References". There is only one link under "See also" and only three citations in the references. The tone is generally academic and neutral. The sources come from an academic journal, an encyclopedia, and a book. Not every piece of information in the article is cited. The article is a part of a WikiProject. It has not been given a rating on the quality or importance scale. None of the cited sources were published within the past five years. What are some more recent ideas and conclusions that researchers and critical theorists have published regarding curriculum studies? Autumns310 (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question of Importance?[edit]

Hey this looks good. I am wondering about how you went about deciding what books were"important" to the field. Did you maybe have a source on that or is it opinion? Maybe you could expound on what makes them important a bit more. Cheers. --Rainydey (talk) 04:55, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Comment: Check out my bibliography. There are a variety of resources that may be helpful. Camiadmire (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New comment 1. How do you get rid of a template message at the topic of your wiki.edu page? I feel as if I have fixed the issues but I can not get it clear. 2. Where do you post this for the did you know nomination? {{subst: NewDYKnomination article= Curriculum Studies Hook=...that there is more than one type of curriculum? Status= New Author: Camiadmire — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camiadmire (talk • contribs) 17:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Content Area Literacy[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 6 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camiadmire (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Camiadmire (talk) 19:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]