Talk:British Rail Class 334

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Facts[edit]

Please check your facts before posting on this article. I had to fix a few things this morning.

There were always 40 Junipers.

Sources: http://www.spt.co.uk/rail/juniper.html

I've also tidied up the announcement system to reflect what she actually says. If you don't know, don't make it up.

Thanks.

> The announcement system is not able to display tailed letters on screen and instead uses capitals. [eg luGGaGe]

Who the hell is doctor flange?!

This is actually almost true. Due to the size, sentances like "We are now approaching Ayr" appear as "We are now aPProachin9 AYr". The PIS screens are not big enough to show the tailed letters properly. 82.40.75.55 12:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Announcements - does anyone know why some say "Please change here for Gartnavel Hospital", and some say "Please alight here for Gartnavel hospital"? Talking train woman firmware can't deal with the difference? User misconfiguration? Gordonjcp (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliability[edit]

In what way are the 334's so unreliable.

Mainly because they are new trains, they are unrelianle :-D

I believe there have been technical difficulties with the fleet.

82.40.75.55 21:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, I would state that the 334's are MORE common on the North Clyde line than the 320. Panthro 18:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

??? Not actually true, although they can appear to be more common during peak times. In fact, 320s can only operate on the North Clydes at the moment, so using more 334s would be a stupid idea. 77.97.28.34 (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible change to the title of this article[edit]

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 334. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 334. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Build Date[edit]

The Class 334s we’re built 1999-01 same build date as the Class 333s 2A01:4B00:854C:2A00:DF3:A71B:AC35:B0D6 (talk) 11:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source? - David Biddulph (talk) 11:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]