This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dacia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DaciaWikipedia:WikiProject DaciaTemplate:WikiProject DaciaDacia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Don't we have information about the strength of these armies? At least there should be a approximate data about it. With respect, Deliogul 09:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, we don't have the slightest idea from the primary sources. Unfortunately, everything in the written history of 3rd century is too vague after Cassius Dio, Marius Maximus and Herodian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipa1965 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
hi ..in here, the calendar.. [[1]] ..it says 1st of july ..but in the article here it all says 1st of june .. what is right ? --82.178.92.252 (talk) 16:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Abrittus or Abritus, Terebronii or Thebronii or Trebonii ?[edit]
Eons of scribal errors make the spelling so uncertain. In the following days I hope to find a definite answer. If Abritus is the correct spelling, then I 'll move the article. Does someone have the complete report of T. Ivanov? Perhaps there is archaeological evidence there. Dipa1965 (talk) 09:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The spelling is "Abritus" - there is a specific inscription found on a limestone alter in 1954 and referred to by Ivanov in his published papers - this was found at the site at Razgrad and refers (in latin) to "Abrito" - which precludes the spelling "Abrittus". Tim Ferdinand May 2010
Tim, it would be nice if you either provide a link for the Ivanov's paper or correct the current article, with appropriate citation. Best regards.--Dipa1965 (talk) 20:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
New articles about Dexippus fragments online[edit]