User contributions for Lost-n-translation
A user with 384 edits. Account created on 30 April 2009.
1 May 2024
- 18:3218:32, 1 May 2024 diff hist +179 m Hopf lemma →General discussion current
- 18:2518:25, 1 May 2024 diff hist +45 m Hopf lemma →General discussion: the absolutely crucial assumption on the sign on c was ignored in first formulation
24 June 2023
- 16:2316:23, 24 June 2023 diff hist +25 m Laplace–Beltrami operator →Details
5 December 2022
- 15:5815:58, 5 December 2022 diff hist +1 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 15:5715:57, 5 December 2022 diff hist 0 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 15:5615:56, 5 December 2022 diff hist +39 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 15:5515:55, 5 December 2022 diff hist +20 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 15:5415:54, 5 December 2022 diff hist +609 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:5201:52, 5 December 2022 diff hist +287 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3801:38, 5 December 2022 diff hist +777 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:1301:13, 5 December 2022 diff hist 0 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 01:1201:12, 5 December 2022 diff hist +586 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:5900:59, 5 December 2022 diff hist +540 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:4300:43, 5 December 2022 diff hist +283 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
4 December 2022
- 22:5622:56, 4 December 2022 diff hist +2 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 22:5622:56, 4 December 2022 diff hist +578 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:2522:25, 4 December 2022 diff hist +3 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 22:2422:24, 4 December 2022 diff hist +498 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:1622:16, 4 December 2022 diff hist +1 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 22:1522:15, 4 December 2022 diff hist +1 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 22:1422:14, 4 December 2022 diff hist +18 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 22:1422:14, 4 December 2022 diff hist +143 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 22:1222:12, 4 December 2022 diff hist +625 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:0622:06, 4 December 2022 diff hist +206 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 22:0022:00, 4 December 2022 diff hist +452 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:5421:54, 4 December 2022 diff hist +7 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 21:4921:49, 4 December 2022 diff hist +362 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:4721:47, 4 December 2022 diff hist +243 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:3812:38, 4 December 2022 diff hist +3 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 12:3612:36, 4 December 2022 diff hist +1 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 12:3612:36, 4 December 2022 diff hist +41 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 12:3512:35, 4 December 2022 diff hist −61 m Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro
- 12:3012:30, 4 December 2022 diff hist +634 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Big-oh to big-theta in intro: Reply Tag: Reply
3 December 2022
- 13:0413:04, 3 December 2022 diff hist +232 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 13:0213:02, 3 December 2022 diff hist −5 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 13:0113:01, 3 December 2022 diff hist −17 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 13:0013:00, 3 December 2022 diff hist +1 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 12:5912:59, 3 December 2022 diff hist +115 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 12:5912:59, 3 December 2022 diff hist +300 Talk:Stirling's approximation →Does the log-base-2 version really belong in the lead?
- 12:1512:15, 3 December 2022 diff hist +147 m Stirling's approximation Need clarity on what a 1good approximation' is. What qualifies as accurate?
- 12:1112:11, 3 December 2022 diff hist +51 User:Lost-n-translation No edit summary current
- 12:1012:10, 3 December 2022 diff hist +2 User:Lost-n-translation No edit summary
- 12:0912:09, 3 December 2022 diff hist −117 User:Lost-n-translation No edit summary
2 December 2022
- 23:0123:01, 2 December 2022 diff hist +184 m Stirling's approximation The coefficient is not incorrect. The bound is correct. Did you know that if x < 1/2 then x < 1? Perhaps you mean it's not a sharp? Tag: Undo
- 22:3622:36, 2 December 2022 diff hist +12 Stirling's approximation →Further reading
- 22:2622:26, 2 December 2022 diff hist +117 m Stirling's approximation @ Epstein. Do you want me to get rid of the big Theta stuff instead? Tag: Undo
- 17:2817:28, 2 December 2022 diff hist +117 m Stirling's approximation added a user friendly estimate that does not use Big theta stuff Tag: Reverted
