User contributions for 45.72.201.225
For 45.72.201.225 talk block log logs filter log
10 March 2021
- 02:2102:21, 10 March 2021 diff hist +679 Talk:False consciousness →False article
- 02:1002:10, 10 March 2021 diff hist +376 Talk:False consciousness →Sociology vs Marxism
- 02:0702:07, 10 March 2021 diff hist −6 Talk:False consciousness →Sociology vs Marxism
- 02:0502:05, 10 March 2021 diff hist +167 Talk:False consciousness →Sociology vs Marxism
- 02:0102:01, 10 March 2021 diff hist +1,025 Talk:False consciousness →Sociology vs Marxism: new section
- 01:4401:44, 10 March 2021 diff hist +146 User talk:TimothyBlue →False Consciousness Tag: Reverted
- 01:4201:42, 10 March 2021 diff hist +963 User talk:TimothyBlue →False Consciousness: new section Tag: Reverted
- 01:3001:30, 10 March 2021 diff hist −12 False consciousness "'False consciousness' is a term used by sociologists" Is a claim. You will need to cite sources, to support the claim that the science of sociology has consensus on the use of these terms. Please refrain from making statements of fact, or claims about science, without providing sources.
9 March 2021
- 21:0021:00, 9 March 2021 diff hist −4 False consciousness It is entirely misleading and manipulative to claim that SOCIOLOGISTS have agreed upon the term "proletariat" to describe anything. Sociology is supposed to be an empirical science, not a cult. Please cite sources that indicate the sociology profession has a unanimous agreement about using the term "proletariat" in this regard or any other. You may find MARXIST sociologists who espouse this rhetoric, but there is no EMPERICAL SCIENCE to this claim Tag: Reverted
- 20:5220:52, 9 March 2021 diff hist +109 False consciousness No edit summary Tag: Reverted
4 February 2021
- 23:5923:59, 4 February 2021 diff hist −746 Nordic race That is entirely irrelevant to the article. Also, one guy's very nuclear hot take doesnt justify eliminating an entire branch of science. Tag: Reverted