User contributions for 2A02:1810:4F0B:500:7791:C6EF:E1E4:5282

15 February 2023

• 19:1919:19, 15 February 2023 diff hist +6‎ Battle Angel Alita: Last Order ‎ reading the definition of "sequel", it was indeed the wrong word, "antecedent" is better suited
• 19:1819:18, 15 February 2023 diff hist +8‎ Battle Angel Alita: Mars Chronicle ‎ reading the definition of "sequel", it was indeed the wrong word, "antecedent" is better suited
• 19:0919:09, 15 February 2023 diff hist +645‎ Battle Angel Alita: Last Order ‎ The original series, last order and Mars Chronicle are ONE continuous story, cut in 3 series (which started due to health issues of the mangaka). Anything relating to the OG is therefore automatically also related to the "sequels" Tag: Undo
• 19:0719:07, 15 February 2023 diff hist +632‎ Battle Angel Alita: Mars Chronicle ‎ The original series, last order and Mars Chronicle are ONE continuous story, cut in 3 series (which started due to health issues of the mangaka). Anything relating to the OG is therefore automatically also related to the "sequels" Tag: Undo

10 February 2023

• 18:1918:19, 10 February 2023 diff hist +260‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Examples for fanon?: Reply Tag: Reply
• 18:1618:16, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon ‎ Bringing this page in line with the page, canon (fiction), it is referring to Tag: Undo
• 18:1418:14, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon (fiction) ‎ Now that the issue has been settled by a wikipedia authority, the edit war has come to an end and we can remove the unsupported claim. Tag: Undo
• 18:0918:09, 10 February 2023 diff hist +1,233‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:Smitterdin reported by User:Veverve (Result: Partial block): Reply Tag: Reply
• 17:2417:24, 10 February 2023 diff hist +633‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 17:1817:18, 10 February 2023 diff hist +818‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 17:1417:14, 10 February 2023 diff hist +347‎ User talk:Smitterdin ‎ →‎edit warring: new section Tag: New topic
• 17:1217:12, 10 February 2023 diff hist +2,565‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:Smitterdin reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
• 16:4816:48, 10 February 2023 diff hist +575‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 16:3216:32, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon (fiction) ‎ Smitterdin, stop your vandalism and edit warring, you have no sources to back up your claims, the sources, in fact, contradict your claim. You have been warned many times, any further vandalism will be reported Tags: Undo Reverted
• 16:3016:30, 10 February 2023 diff hist +380‎ User talk:Veverve ‎ →‎Regarding Smitterdin's vandalism of the canon (fiction) page: new section Tag: New topic
• 16:1916:19, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon ‎ reverting vandalism Tags: Undo Reverted
• 16:1916:19, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon (fiction) ‎ reverting vandalism Tags: Undo Reverted
• 15:0415:04, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon ‎ corrected Canon (fiction) to make it match its article Tag: Reverted
• 15:0215:02, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon (fiction) ‎ Not a single reputable source backs up the claim that canon needs to be accepted by the fan base. Some sources completely omit the "need to be accepted" and others merely stated that canon is accepted but do not state by whom. Saying that it is "the fan base" and not the franchise owners or staff of creators is purely personal conjecture and has no place on wikipedia
• 07:1807:18, 10 February 2023 diff hist +1,466‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 06:4406:44, 10 February 2023 diff hist +864‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 06:2706:27, 10 February 2023 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎No edit summary
• 06:2706:27, 10 February 2023 diff hist +292‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎No edit summary
• 06:2406:24, 10 February 2023 diff hist +611‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 06:0706:07, 10 February 2023 diff hist +775‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 05:5905:59, 10 February 2023 diff hist +1,490‎ Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase ‎ →‎Canon (fiction): Reply Tag: Reply
• 05:4805:48, 10 February 2023 diff hist +271‎ User talk:2A02:1810:4F0B:500:7791:C6EF:E1E4:5282 ‎ →‎Canon (fiction): Reply current Tag: Reply
• 05:2405:24, 10 February 2023 diff hist +6‎ Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase ‎ →‎Canon (fiction)
• 05:2305:23, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon ‎ undoing false claims by vandal who has been attacking the "canon (fiction) page for 1.5 years Tags: Undo Reverted
• 05:2205:22, 10 February 2023 diff hist +524‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 05:2005:20, 10 February 2023 diff hist +76‎ Canon (fiction) ‎ talk page explains in detail that your claim is unfounded and that the source you use even contradicts your claim. You have been vandalizing this page for 1.5 years. Stop it now. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 05:0105:01, 10 February 2023 diff hist −30‎ Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase ‎ →‎https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)
• 04:5904:59, 10 February 2023 diff hist +1,341‎ Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase ‎ Requesting protection for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)
• 01:5501:55, 10 February 2023 diff hist +73‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ fixing layout
• 01:4401:44, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon ‎ don't make false claims Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:3101:31, 10 February 2023 diff hist +2,070‎ Talk:Canon (fiction) ‎ →‎Canon is "defined" by the fanbase
• 01:0501:05, 10 February 2023 diff hist +76‎ Canon (fiction) ‎ The reference you posted does not support the wild claim you make. You are deliberately misrepresenting the source. Stop making unsupported edits. Wikipedia is not your personal blog Tags: Undo Reverted

9 February 2023

• 04:2504:25, 9 February 2023 diff hist +660‎ Battle Angel Alita: Mars Chronicle ‎ expanding the infobox to make it more in line with the page of the original series Tag: Reverted
• 04:2304:23, 9 February 2023 diff hist +672‎ Battle Angel Alita: Last Order ‎ expanding the infobox to make it more in line with the page of the original series Tag: Reverted
• 04:2204:22, 9 February 2023 diff hist +18‎ Battle Angel Alita ‎No edit summary
• 00:1000:10, 9 February 2023 diff hist +271‎ Canon (fiction) ‎ previous edit accidentally broke a reference, fixed the error Tag: Reverted

8 February 2023

• 23:3023:30, 8 February 2023 diff hist −195‎ Canon (fiction) ‎ Corrected error in article based on misinterpretation of its source. The source said that "some people don't accept canon as ..." but this doesn't define canon, it merely explains some people reject the concept. Just like how saying "some people don't accept the world to be an oblate sphere" doesn't count as evidence that the earth is flat. Thus the deleted part of the article has no source nor any support. Added a more appropriate source (Merriam-Webster) instead Tags: Undo Reverted
• 23:2523:25, 8 February 2023 diff hist −16‎ Canon ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
• 23:2323:23, 8 February 2023 diff hist −195‎ Canon (fiction) ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted