User contributions for 188.220.86.46
Appearance
For 188.220.86.46 talk block log logs filter log
23 February 2021
- 14:1614:16, 23 February 2021 diff hist +1,486 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Unsourced content: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:0814:08, 23 February 2021 diff hist −143 Talk:Music (2021 film) →RfC about the neutrality/balance of this article, and which type of English to use.?: Fixing closure of RfC
- 14:0614:06, 23 February 2021 diff hist +348 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Music (2021 film) discussion: Adding diff.
- 14:0114:01, 23 February 2021 diff hist +548 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Music (2021 film) discussion
- 13:5513:55, 23 February 2021 diff hist −3 Music (2021 film) Undid revision 1008472937 by Peterpie123rww (talk) Why? It has killed, so it is potentially deadly. If we are using "dangerous" than we should simply use it without the potentially. If we want to signal that it could hypothetically be safe, then "potentially deadly" explicitly clarifies that. Tag: Undo
- 13:5313:53, 23 February 2021 diff hist +642 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Blackface accusation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:5013:50, 23 February 2021 diff hist +1,702 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Unsourced content: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:3813:38, 23 February 2021 diff hist −3 Music (2021 film) minor change: potentially dangerous -> potentially deadly. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
22 February 2021
- 23:5623:56, 22 February 2021 diff hist +6 Music (2021 film) "In reality, the use of prone or supine restraint has killed dozens of children – often ones on the Autism spectrum" - A circular saw isn't gonna kill you if used properly, but is still dangerous. Tag: Undo
- 21:4021:40, 22 February 2021 diff hist +541 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Blackface accusation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:3320:33, 22 February 2021 diff hist +562 User talk:Robert McClenon →How to compose RfC's: new section Tag: New topic
- 20:2920:29, 22 February 2021 diff hist +346 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Unsourced content: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:2520:25, 22 February 2021 diff hist +47 Music (2021 film) Slightly different phrasing, but the explicit clarifying that zieglier is not autistic is relevant and vital to the narrative. Tag: Visual edit
- 20:2120:21, 22 February 2021 diff hist +1,071 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Blackface accusation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:1120:11, 22 February 2021 diff hist +397 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Unsourced content: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:3419:34, 22 February 2021 diff hist +1,499 User talk:Peterpie123rww →Music 2021: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:1219:12, 22 February 2021 diff hist +347 Talk:Battered woman syndrome →Title: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:1119:11, 22 February 2021 diff hist +412 Battered woman syndrome Update to ICD-10-CM link for the condition. Tag: Visual edit
- 18:5518:55, 22 February 2021 diff hist +233 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Music (2021 film) discussion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:5418:54, 22 February 2021 diff hist +2,636 User talk:Peterpie123rww →Music 2021: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:4218:42, 22 February 2021 diff hist +497 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Blackface accusation: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5715:57, 22 February 2021 diff hist +104 Music (2021 film) Slightly improved phrasing. I think at present it'd be better to say "allegedly" (some sources are using that phrasing), if more confidence in this issue comes out it could be revised. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 15:5315:53, 22 February 2021 diff hist +1,409 Music (2021 film) undid revert and added 2 sources. - Multiple news sources have reported on it now. Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- 15:4115:41, 22 February 2021 diff hist +245 User talk:Peterpie123rww →Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:5613:56, 22 February 2021 diff hist +815 User talk:Peterpie123rww →DRN discussion, Music (film 2021): new section Tag: New topic
- 13:5613:56, 22 February 2021 diff hist +815 User talk:Ssilvers →DRN discussion, Music (film 2021): new section Tag: New topic
- 13:5613:56, 22 February 2021 diff hist +815 User talk:Erik →DRN discussion, Music (film 2021): new section Tag: New topic
- 13:5613:56, 22 February 2021 diff hist +815 User talk:Hcutts12 →DRN discussion, Music (film 2021): new section current Tag: New topic
- 13:5613:56, 22 February 2021 diff hist +815 User talk:Tailskin2021 →DRN discussion, Music (film 2021): new section Tag: New topic
- 13:5613:56, 22 February 2021 diff hist +815 User talk:Nyxaros →DRN discussion, Music (film 2021): new section Tags: Reverted New topic
- 13:5613:56, 22 February 2021 diff hist +815 User talk:Feoffer →DRN discussion, Music (film 2021): new section Tag: New topic
- 13:5513:55, 22 February 2021 diff hist +4,335 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Music (2021 film): new section
- 13:5313:53, 22 February 2021 diff hist +2,060 User talk:Peterpie123rww →Music 2021: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:2713:27, 22 February 2021 diff hist +416 Music (2021 film) Unnecessary reversion without reason.
- 13:2713:27, 22 February 2021 diff hist +964 User talk:Peterpie123rww →Music 2021: new section Tag: New topic
- 12:3812:38, 22 February 2021 diff hist +357 Talk:Music (2021 film) →Sourcing the petition directly: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:3812:38, 22 February 2021 diff hist +176 MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist →change.org: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:2412:24, 22 February 2021 diff hist +41 Talk:Music (2021 film) →RfC about the neutrality/balance of this article, and which type of English to use.?
- 12:2112:21, 22 February 2021 diff hist +3 Talk:Music (2021 film) →RfC about the neutrality/balance of this article, and which type of English to use.?: Closing
- 12:2012:20, 22 February 2021 diff hist +141 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Music (Sia) - Difficulty in reaching discussions...: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:1912:19, 22 February 2021 diff hist +297 Music (2021 film) →Portrayal of autism: Removed invisible note (section does not belong as a part of reception as Erik noted). Added an additional source to support the removed (already sourced) statement. Tag: Visual edit
- 02:2602:26, 22 February 2021 diff hist +617 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Music (Sia) - Difficulty in reaching discussions...: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:2201:22, 22 February 2021 diff hist +24 Talk:Battered woman syndrome It's in ICD-10-CM, not the central ICD-10 by the looks of it?
- 01:1701:17, 22 February 2021 diff hist +1,641 Talk:Battered woman syndrome →Title: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:0101:01, 22 February 2021 diff hist −10 Music (2021 film) It would probably be fair to say it recieved "overwhelmingly negative reviews", simply saying "negative" or "largely negative" reviews is probably sugarcoating as is. Tag: Visual edit
- 00:5700:57, 22 February 2021 diff hist +1,750 User talk:CambridgeBayWeather →Music (Sia) - Difficulty in reaching discussions...: new section Tag: New topic
- 00:4100:41, 22 February 2021 diff hist +1,213 Talk:Music (2021 film) →"Sia and Dallas wrong the screenplay": Reply Tag: Reply
21 February 2021
- 21:2721:27, 21 February 2021 diff hist 0 Rhodes International Airport →Traffic figures: Changed a few anomalous entries from using periods (.) to commas (,) for thousands/millions. Tag: Visual edit
- 18:5318:53, 21 February 2021 diff hist +711 Talk:Music (2021 film) →"Sia and Dallas wrong the screenplay": Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4917:49, 21 February 2021 diff hist +420 Talk:Music (2021 film) →"Sia and Dallas wrong the screenplay": Reply Tag: Reply