User contributions for 109.205.143.163

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

20:4820:48, 1 November 2023 diff hist −21‎ Castellón de la Plana ‎ Reverting the changes by LucenseLugo. There is no 'prevailing name in English' for Castelló (besides, 'Castelló is currently the only official name). And all the other things he changed (names of streets, etc.) have their name exclusively in Valencian. Please, try to keep nationalism (Spanish or of any other kind) out of Wikipedia. Tags: Manual revert Reverted nowiki added Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

07:4107:41, 20 October 2023 diff hist +107‎ Talk:Valencian language ‎No edit summary
07:3107:31, 20 October 2023 diff hist +2,510‎ Talk:Valencian language ‎No edit summary
06:4806:48, 20 October 2023 diff hist +17‎ Valencian language ‎ As for the misinterpretation of the source, this would be my fourth edit instead of the third, i.e. this would mean edit warring, so I will simply add this tag. LucenseLugo: If you have not read the reference (which you clearly haven't), you should not be modifying what it states
06:3406:34, 20 October 2023 diff hist +120‎ Valencian language ‎ Restoring the lead to its stable version. Saying that you are restoring things to the way they were before warring while you at the same time restore an edit you made and did not consensuate is cheating Tag: Reverted

17:1317:13, 19 October 2023 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Valencian language ‎No edit summary
17:1217:12, 19 October 2023 diff hist +5‎ Talk:Valencian language ‎No edit summary
17:1117:11, 19 October 2023 diff hist +4,594‎ Talk:Valencian language ‎No edit summary
16:1816:18, 19 October 2023 diff hist +687‎ Valencian language ‎ And you are right, this is not consensuated, so I am returning the lead to its previous status. However, this also means restoring the information deleted by that 'mysterious' IP.
16:1016:10, 19 October 2023 diff hist −129‎ Valencian language ‎ You are misinterpreting the source. I already explained it in the talk page, so please read it before making any changes. And, perhaps unwillingly, it's you who's cherry picking: among the four variables that are shown to be relevant, you are selecting only two and leaving out the other two. That study is not a poll. Tag: Manual revert

15:2615:26, 18 October 2023 diff hist −5‎ Valencian language ‎No edit summary Tag: Reverted
15:2515:25, 18 October 2023 diff hist +13‎ Valencian language ‎ Re-ordering so as to match the order of relevance of the variables according to the source, and adding a missing word. Tag: Reverted
15:1115:11, 18 October 2023 diff hist +1,464‎ Talk:Valencian language ‎No edit summary
12:5212:52, 18 October 2023 diff hist +16‎ Valencian language ‎ This phrase was misleading. Virtually everyone who acknowledges the unity of Catalan and Valencian thinks of the latter as a language in its own right (scholars treat "Valencian language" and "Catalan language" as synonyms). They simply claim that, as a language, it is not different from Catalan. Tag: Reverted
12:4812:48, 18 October 2023 diff hist −191‎ Valencian language ‎ The regression is employed for making clear which variables are actually relevant, not for determining mere co-relations (the latter is what polls do). I corrected that and I ordered the information. Also, I moved the whole discussion on the data to the controversy section. Official or not, there is no reason for privileging one poll over any others, as long as they have been conducted by academics (specially if the poll is that old). Thus, the lead is further shortened and no info is repeated. Tag: Reverted

11:1211:12, 16 October 2023 diff hist +945‎ Talk:Valencian language ‎No edit summary
10:4910:49, 16 October 2023 diff hist +1,243‎ Valencian language ‎ Undid revision 1180329493 by LucenseLugo (talk) 1) The regression is applied directly on the CIS data, not on "data from 1980 and 1990". What kind of academic journal would publish a paper with such old data? Please read the paper before making such an assertion. 2) This is sourced information. If the lead is too long, then it should be moved elsewhere (along with the rest of the whole discussion on the data), not removed.

15:2515:25, 15 October 2023 diff hist +1,240‎ Valencian language ‎ Clarifying what the CIS studies actually show Tag: Reverted