Talk:Countess Palatine Ingrid von Marburg/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 23:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
I'll read this over and post up a review later. Sagecandor (talk) 23:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Successful good article nomination[edit]
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 14, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: This one is good. The lede section is just great. Good summary. Well written. The writing style overall is good. The structural presentation of the article is good. Good layout. Liking how the article seamlessly merges what could normally be a Production section into the body text of the article.
- 2. Verifiable?: Great job sourcing on the Story arc section. Yeah, I made a minor executive decision as the good article reviewer and changed the title from just Arc to Story arc. Great job citing everywhere else.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects, including Introduction, Story arc, Development, Creation and casting, Characterization and morality, Critical reception.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Story arc is written in a neutral manner. Development section shows matter of fact wording. Critical reception section and lede intro section conform with NPOV.
- 5. Stable? Stable going back over a month. Not much arguments on talk page, none actually.
- 6. Images?: 2 images. 1 fair use. 1 free use. File:LucyLawlessCountessofEvil.jpg excellent fair use rationale. File:Janet Montgomery April 2015.jpg good licensing on free use. Suggest swapping with free use picture of the actress and not another character.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 21:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)