Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
28 May 2024
- diffhist Hijab 06:50 +437 AnomieBOT talk contribs (Rescuing orphaned refs ("The Quran Does Not Mandate Hijab" from rev 1225826005))
- diffhist Hijab 04:46 −487 24.80.226.49 talk
26 May 2024
- diffhist m Hijab 23:28 −7 Wiiformii talk contribs (Reverted edits by 2601:2C5:847F:9FC0:392B:217B:99B:A651 (talk) (AV)) Tags: AntiVandal Rollback
- diffhist Hijab 23:27 +7 2601:2c5:847f:9fc0:392b:217b:99b:a651 talk Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
25 May 2024
- diffhist Reasonable accommodation 13:32 +1,175 Tom Morris talk contribs (UK - slight expansion and update) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Reasonable accommodation 10:41 +77 Shaws username talk contribs (Adding local short description: "Changes to a system to accommodate someone with a need", overriding Wikidata description "change to usual system, especially to benefit a person with a disability") Tag: Shortdesc helper
- diffhist m Hijab 03:48 −4 EngineerGaming9999 talk contribs (The link led to wild-west style clothing) Tag: Visual edit
22 May 2024
- diffhist Hijab 16:29 +482 Andy Dingley talk contribs (Reverted 2 edits by 84.214.34.64 (talk): Rv citation stripping.) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Hijab 14:00 −186 84.214.34.64 talk Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Hijab 13:57 −296 84.214.34.64 talk (Removed misinformation about Islam and anti-islamic bias.) Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21 May 2024
- diffhist Secularism in France 23:23 −284 Dieknon talk contribs (→Current status and debate: Three and a half years should've been enough time for at least one editor to realise what this sentence is about. If they have not, then it's clearly not notable.)