Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
29 May 2024
- diffhist m BuzzFeed 19:17 −11 Marquardtika talk contribs
- diffhist BuzzFeed 02:24 0 Hemiauchenia talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist BuzzFeed 02:23 +36 Hemiauchenia talk contribs (→Vivek Ramaswamy investment) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist BuzzFeed 02:22 +291 Hemiauchenia talk contribs (→Vivek Ramaswamy investment) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist BuzzFeed 01:49 +3 Hemiauchenia talk contribs (→Vivek Ramaswamy investment) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist BuzzFeed 01:48 +206 Hemiauchenia talk contribs (→Vivek Ramaswamy investment) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist BuzzFeed 01:43 −232 Hemiauchenia talk contribs (→2024 Activist investments) Tag: Visual edit
28 May 2024
- diffhist BuzzFeed 15:36 0 2601:19e:427e:5bb0:1124:42c:5ddd:78cf talk (Small typo.)
- diffhist BuzzFeed 15:36 +1,559 2601:19e:427e:5bb0:1124:42c:5ddd:78cf talk (Added recent news on Vivek Ramaswamy's activist investment stake using several RS like AP, FT, CNN, and WaPo.)
- diffhist BuzzFeed 07:19 −875 Morris80315436 talk contribs (Reverting edit(s) by 219.88.101.176 (talk) to rev. 1223127983 by Ergzay: WP:NPOV vio language, source is an opinion piece and should be attributed (RW 16.1)) Tags: RW Undo
- diffhist BuzzFeed 06:40 +875 219.88.101.176 talk (→Reputation as a news site: Updated section about critisism of BuzzFeed for their article claiming Cohen lied to congress about pursuing Russian business deals on behalf of Trump upto June 2016. Updated to cite recent article recording that Cohen had lied when he made said denial.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
27 May 2024
- diffhist The Guardian 22:09 −18 Jessintime talk contribs (not sure what the Japanese (?) text is for)
- diffhist The Guardian 21:31 −410 Eldomtom2 talk contribs (Undid revision 1225857345 by Mokadoshi (talk)it is a misinterpretation of the source, which only says it "struck a sour note", and if you actually read the editorial in question it's clear the guardian was not opposing the creation of the nhs)
- diffhist The Guardian 10:13 −2 MSincccc talk contribs (→GuardianFilms: British English) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist The Guardian 04:12 +428 Mokadoshi talk contribs (Undid revision 1225505874 by Eldomtom2 (talk) Doesn't look like a misinterpretation of the source to me (page 285 on Google Books)) Tag: Undo
24 May 2024
- diffhist The Guardian 21:09 −428 Eldomtom2 talk contribs (→Post-war: the guardian did not oppose the NHS - this is a total misinterpretation of the source!) Tag: Reverted