Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. If any of the following apply to a desired move, treat it as potentially controversial:

• There is an existing article (not just a redirect) at the target title;
• There has been any past debate about the best title for the page;
• Someone could reasonably disagree with the move.

If a desired move is uncontroversial and technical in nature (e.g. spelling), please feel free to move the page yourself. If the page has recently been moved without discussion, you may revert the move and initiate a discussion on its talk page. In either case, if you are unable to complete the move, request it below.

• To list a technical request, go to the bottom of this section that you are reading right now; edit the subsection Uncontroversial technical requests; insert the following code at the top:

{{subst:RMassist|<!--old page name, without brackets-->|<!--requested name, without brackets-->|reason= <!--reason for move-->}}

This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.

• If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move it to the Contested technical requests section. Add a note saying "Moved by..." and add your signature with ~~~~.

• If your technical request is contested by another editor, please remove it from the contested technical requests section and follow the instructions at Requesting potentially controversial moves.

• Alternatively, if the only obstacle to an uncontroversial move is another page in the way, you can ask for the deletion of the other page. This may apply, for example, if the other page is currently a redirect to the article to be moved, a redirect with no incoming links, or an unnecessary disambiguation page with a minor edit history. To request the other page be deleted, add the following code to the top of the page that is in the way:

{{db-move|<!--page to be moved here-->|<!--reason for move-->}}

This will list the undesired page for deletion under criterion for speedy deletion G6. If the page is a redirect, place the code above the redirection. For a list of articles being considered for uncontroversial speedy deletion, see Category:Candidates for uncontroversial speedy deletion.

Contested technical requests

• Florence White → Florence White (writer) (move · discuss) – make room for disambiguation page – Inwind (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

• @Inwind: Can you create Florence White (disambiguation) first? I cannot say that I am able to find an immediate need for a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 19:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Note: Per the discussion with Inwind on my talk page, the other article is Florence White (painter). Steel1943 (talk) 19:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

• Chronic condition → Chronic Disease and Condition (move · discuss) – The current title, Chronic condition, should not be the only thing specified. For one, Chronic disease is the more well known/well understood term worldwide. So, in order to keep this uniformity for the viewers, the name should either include the words Chronic Disease or both terms: conditions and disease. Furthermore, the article itslef refers to disease throughout its page, so it only makes sense to call the page Chronic Disease at the least or, in order to encompass more, Chronic Disease and Conditions. – Gurshawnstuteja (talk) 18:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC) moved by Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)