Jump to content

Libertarianism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Elockid (talk | contribs)
m (edit summary removed)
→‎Individualist anarchism: move up remaining material from European section
Line 73: Line 73:
===Nineteenth century===
===Nineteenth century===


====Early individualist anarchism====
====Individualist anarchism====
{{Main|Individualist anarchism|Individualist anarchism in the United States}}
{{Main|Individualist anarchism|Individualist anarchism in the United States|European individualist anarchism}}
[[File:Josiah Warren.jpg|190px|thumb|Josiah Warren]]
[[File:Josiah Warren.jpg|190px|thumb|Josiah Warren]]


During the 19th century a tradition of individualist anarchism developed that influenced 20th century libertarianism. [[Benjamin Tucker]], [[Lysander Spooner]], [[Ezra Heywood]], [[William B. Greene]], [[J.K. Ingalls]], and [[Stephen Pearl Andrews]] opposed the idea of equalitarian conformity. They supported a world free of the state and monopolistic privileges, where individuals were free to trade. They were influenced by individualist German philosophers like [[Johann Gottleib Fichte]], [[Max Stirner]] and [[Friedrich Nietzsche]].<ref>[[Chris Matthew Sciabarra]], ''Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism'', [[Penn State Press]], 2000, [http://books.google.com/books?id=Ly9S2quKl1EC&pg=PA196&dq=libertarianism+individualist+anarchism&hl=en&sa=X&ei=y5xAUdi8Lce-0QGBwYHQBQ&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=libertarianism%20individualist%20anarchism&f=false p. 196.], ISBN 0271020490, 9780271020495</ref> They also were influenced by Britain's [[Herbert Spencer]] and France's [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]].<ref name=McElroy1>[[Wendy McElroy]], [http://mises.org/journals/jls/5_3/5_3_4.pdf "The culture of individualist anarchist in Late-nineteenth century America"], [[Journal of Libertarian Studies]], Vol. 5, No. 3, (Summer 1981), at [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] website.</ref>
During the 19th century a tradition of individualist anarchism developed that continued into and influenced 20th century libertarianism. [[Benjamin Tucker]], [[Lysander Spooner]], [[Ezra Heywood]], [[William B. Greene]], [[J.K. Ingalls]], and [[Stephen Pearl Andrews]] opposed the idea of equalitarian conformity. They supported a world free of the state and monopolistic privileges, where individuals were free to trade. They were influenced by individualist German philosophers like [[Johann Gottleib Fichte]], [[Max Stirner]] and [[Friedrich Nietzsche]].<ref>[[Chris Matthew Sciabarra]], ''Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism'', [[Penn State Press]], 2000, [http://books.google.com/books?id=Ly9S2quKl1EC&pg=PA196&dq=libertarianism+individualist+anarchism&hl=en&sa=X&ei=y5xAUdi8Lce-0QGBwYHQBQ&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=libertarianism%20individualist%20anarchism&f=false p. 196.], ISBN 0271020490, 9780271020495</ref> They also were influenced by Britain's [[Herbert Spencer]] and France's [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]].<ref name=McElroy1>[[Wendy McElroy]], [http://mises.org/journals/jls/5_3/5_3_4.pdf "The culture of individualist anarchist in Late-nineteenth century America"], [[Journal of Libertarian Studies]], Vol. 5, No. 3, (Summer 1981), at [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] website.</ref>


[[Josiah Warren]]'s individualistic philosophy arose from rejection of [[Robert Owen]]'s failed cooperative movement in the 1820s, of which he was a participant. Of it, he wrote: "It seemed that the difference of opinion, tastes, and purposes increased just in proportion to the demand for conformity […] It appeared that it was nature's own inherent law of diversity that had conquered us […] our 'united interests' were directly at war with the individualities of persons and circumstances and the instinct of self-preservation". Warren even rejected community of property which he considered "doomed to failure because of the individuality of the persons involved in such an experiment."<ref>Butler, Ann Caldwell. "[http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/4_4/4_4_8.pdf Josiah Warren and the Sovereignty of the Individual]". ''[[Journal of Libertarian Studies]]'', Vol. IV, No. 4 (Fall 1980)</ref>
[[Josiah Warren]]'s individualistic philosophy arose from rejection of [[Robert Owen]]'s failed cooperative movement in the 1820s, of which he was a participant. Of it, he wrote: "It seemed that the difference of opinion, tastes, and purposes increased just in proportion to the demand for conformity […] It appeared that it was nature's own inherent law of diversity that had conquered us […] our 'united interests' were directly at war with the individualities of persons and circumstances and the instinct of self-preservation". Warren even rejected community of property which he considered "doomed to failure because of the individuality of the persons involved in such an experiment."<ref>Butler, Ann Caldwell. "[http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/4_4/4_4_8.pdf Josiah Warren and the Sovereignty of the Individual]". ''[[Journal of Libertarian Studies]]'', Vol. IV, No. 4 (Fall 1980)</ref>
Line 87: Line 87:


[[File:Liberty OldPeriodical.jpg|thumb|Benjamin Tucker's ''Liberty''.]]
[[File:Liberty OldPeriodical.jpg|thumb|Benjamin Tucker's ''Liberty''.]]
In the late nineteenth century individualist anarchism was expressed through influential writer [[Benjamin R. Tucker]]'s periodical [[Liberty (1881–1908)| Liberty]] (1881-1908), which [[Wendy McElroy]] calls a “textbook of libertarian culture of the late nineteenth century.” It debated issues among the various strains of individualist anarchism in the Americas and Europe.<ref name=McElroy1/> Tucker himself had a "passionate belief in the moral illegitimacy of the state", which premise he often followed to its uncomfortable conclusions.<ref name=Doherty37/>
In the late nineteenth century individualist anarchism was expressed through influential writer [[Benjamin R. Tucker]]'s periodical [[Liberty (1881–1908)| Liberty]] (1881-1908), which [[Wendy McElroy]] calls a “textbook of libertarian culture of the late nineteenth century.” It debated issues among the various strains of individualist anarchism in the Americas and Europe.<ref name=McElroy1/> Tucker himself had a "passionate belief in the moral illegitimacy of the state", which premise he often followed to its uncomfortable conclusions.<ref name=Doherty37/> "When was widely criticized, Tucker enthusiastically endorsed the poem, urging all of his subscribers to read it. Tucker, in fact, published an American edition. From its early championing of Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass, to it's printing of Oscar Wilde's plea for penal reform called "The Ballad of Reading Gaol", to a series of short stories by Francis du Bosque in its last issues, ''Liberty'' was a vehicle of controversial, avant-garde literature."<ref>Wendy McElroy, [http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1300&chapter=100896&layout=html&Itemid=27 "Benjamin Tucker, Individualism, & Liberty: Not the Daughter but the Mother of Order"], from the Online Library of Liberty.</ref>


An [[Anarchism and issues related to love and sex|important concern]] for American individualist anarchism was [[free love]]. Free love particularly stressed [[women's rights]] since most sexual laws discriminated against women: for example, marriage laws and anti-birth control measures.<ref name=McElroy2>Wendy McElroy, [http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle1996/le961210.html ''The Free Love Movement and Radical Individualism''], The Libertarian Enterprise, Number 19, December 1, 1996.</ref> It produced a number of important publications like ''[[Lucifer the Lightbearer]]'' (1883–1907)<ref>Joanne E. Passet, "Power through Print: Lois Waisbrooker and Grassroots Feminism," in: ''Women in Print: Essays on the Print Culture of American Women from the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries'', James Philip Danky and Wayne A. Wiegand, eds., Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 2006; pp. 229–250.</ref>, ''[[The Word (free love)|''The Word'']]'' (1872–1890, 1892–1893) and ''[[Free Society]]''.<ref name=McElroy2/>
An [[Anarchism and issues related to love and sex|important concern]] for American individualist anarchism was [[free love]]. Free love particularly stressed [[women's rights]] since most sexual laws discriminated against women: for example, marriage laws and anti-birth control measures.<ref name=McElroy2>Wendy McElroy, [http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle1996/le961210.html ''The Free Love Movement and Radical Individualism''], The Libertarian Enterprise, Number 19, December 1, 1996.</ref> It produced a number of important publications like ''[[Lucifer the Lightbearer]]'' (1883–1907)<ref>Joanne E. Passet, "Power through Print: Lois Waisbrooker and Grassroots Feminism," in: ''Women in Print: Essays on the Print Culture of American Women from the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries'', James Philip Danky and Wayne A. Wiegand, eds., Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 2006; pp. 229–250.</ref>, ''[[The Word (free love)|''The Word'']]'' (1872–1890, 1892–1893) and ''[[Free Society]]''.<ref name=McElroy2/>


"[[Freethought]]" was an [[Anti-Christianity|anti-christian]], [[anti-clerical]] movement whose purpose was to make the individual politically and spiritually free to decide on religious matters. The church was seen as a repressive ally of the state. A number of contributors to ''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'' were prominent figures in both freethought and individualist anarchism.<ref name=McElroy1/>
"[[Freethought]]" was an [[Anti-Christianity|anti-christian]], [[anti-clerical]] movement whose purpose was to make the individual politically and spiritually free to decide on religious matters. The church was seen as a repressive ally of the state. A number of contributors to ''[[Liberty (1881–1908)|Liberty]]'' were prominent figures in both freethought and individualist anarchism.<ref name=McElroy1/> Freethought was important in European individualist anarchism and it emphasized criticism of religious dogmas and of the church.<ref>[http://www.viruseditorial.net/pdf/anarquismo%20individualista.pdf Xavier Diez. ''El anarquismo individualista en España (1923–1939)'' Virus Editorial. 2007. p. 143], translated quote: "Anticlericalism, just as in the rest of the libertarian movement, in another of the frequent elements which will gain relevance related to the measure in which the (French) Republic begins to have conflicts with the church..."</ref>

[[Charles-Auguste Bontemps]] and others were active in [[Individualist anarchism in France|French individualist anarchism]]. Their theoretical positions and practices were [[wikt:iconoclastic|iconoclastic]] and scandalous, even within libertarian circles, including nudist [[naturism]], defense of birth control and the idea of '[[Union of egoists|unions of egoists]]' solely for sexual purposes. Spanish individualist anarchists were influenced by American and French theorists, and practiced by individuals like Dorado Montero, Ricardo Mella, [[Federico Urales]] and J. Elizalde.<ref name="frenchexperimentation">[http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2044944 "La insumisión voluntaria. El anarquismo individualista español durante la dictadura y la Segunda República" by Xavier Díez].{{Verify source|date=March 2013}}</ref>


====Mutualism====
====Mutualism====

Revision as of 05:29, 15 March 2013

Libertarianism is a set of related political philosophies that emphasize the primacy of individual liberty, political freedom, and voluntary association. Libertarians advocate a society with a greatly reduced state or no state at all.[1]

There is no consensus definition of libertarianism.[citation needed] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines libertarianism as the moral view that agents initially fully own themselves and have certain moral powers to acquire property rights in external things.[2] George Woodcock, author of a history of libertarianism, defines it as the philosophy that fundamentally doubts authority and advocates transforming society by reform or revolution.[3] Libertarian philosopher Roderick Long defines libertarianism as "any political position that advocates a radical redistribution of power from the coercive state to voluntary associations of free individuals", whether "voluntary association" takes the form of the free market or of communal co-operatives.[4] According to the U.S. Libertarian Party, libertarianism is the advocacy of a government that is funded voluntarily and limited to protecting individuals from coercion and violence.[5][6]

Libertarian schools of thought differ over the degree to which the state has a role.[1] Anarchist schools advocate complete elimination of the state. Minarchist schools advocate a state which is limited to protecting its citizens from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud. Some schools accept government assistance for the poor.[7] Additionally, some schools are supportive of private property rights in the ownership of unappropriated land and natural resources while others reject such private ownership and often support common ownership instead (libertarian socialism).[8][9][10]

Some political scholars assert that in most countries the terms "libertarian" and "libertarianism" are synonymous with left anarchism, and some express disapproval of free-market capitalists calling themselves libertarians.[11] Conversely, other academics as well as proponents of the free market perspectives argue that free-market libertarianism has been successfully propagated beyond the U.S. since the 1970s via think tanks and political parties[12][13] and that "libertarianism" is increasingly viewed worldwide as a free market position.[14][15] Likewise, many libertarian capitalists disapprove of socialists calling themselves "libertarian."[4] In the United States, where the meaning of liberalism has parted significantly from classical liberalism, classical liberalism has largely been renamed libertarianism and is associated with "economically conservative" and "socially liberal" political views (going by the common meanings of "conservative" and "liberal" in the United States),[16][17] along with a foreign policy of non-interventionism.[18][19]

Etymology

The term libertarian in a metaphysical or philosophical sense was first used by late-Enlightenment free-thinkers to refer to those who believed in free will, as opposed to determinism.[20] The first recorded use was in 1789 by William Belsham in a discussion of free will and in opposition to "necessitarian" (or determinist) views.[21][22]

The use of the word "libertarian" to describe a set of political positions can be tracked to the French cognate, libertaire, which was coined in 1857 by French anarchist Joseph Déjacque who used the term to distinguish his libertarian communist approach from the mutualism advocated by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.[23] Hence libertarian has been used by some as a synonym for left anarchism since the 1890s.[24] The term libertarianism is commonly considered to be a synonym of anarchism in countries other than the US.[11] Albert Jay Nock and H.L. Mencken were the first prominent conservatives in the US to call themselves "libertarians," which they used to signify their allegiance to individualism and limited government, feeling that Franklin D. Roosevelt had co-opted the word "liberal" for his New Deal policies, which they opposed.[25]

Philosophy

Libertarian philosophies are generally divided on three principal questions: by ethical theory – whether actions are determined to be moral consequentially or in terms of natural rights (or deontologically), the legitimacy of private property, and the legitimacy of the state. Libertarian philosophy can therefore be broadly divided into six groups based on these distinctions.

Consequentialist–natural rights distinction

There are broadly two different types of libertarianism which are based on ethical doctrines: "consequentialist libertarianism" and "natural rights libertarianism" (or "deontological libertarianism"). Deontological libertarians have the view that natural rights exist, and from there argue that initiation of force and fraud should never take place.[26] Natural rights libertarianism may include both right-libertarianism and left-libertarianism.[27] Consequentialist libertarians argue that a free market and strong private property rights bring about beneficial consequences, such as wealth creation or efficiency, rather than subscribing to a theory of rights or justice.[28] There are hybrid forms of libertarianism that combine deontological and consequentialist reasoning.[28]

Contractarian libertarianism holds that any legitimate authority of government derives not from the consent of the governed, but from contract or mutual agreement, though this can be seen as reducible to consequentialism or deontologism depending on what grounds contracts are justified.[29][30][31] Some libertarian socialists reject deontological and consequential approaches and use historical materialism to justify their political beliefs.[32]

Propertarian–non-propertarian distinction

Propertarian libertarian philosophies define liberty as non-aggression, or the state in which no person or group aggresses against any other person or group, where aggression is defined as the violation of private property.[26] This philosophy implicitly recognizes private property as the sole source of legitimate authority. Propertarian libertarians hold that an order of private property is the only one that is both ethical and leads to the best possible outcomes.[33] They generally support the free-market, and are not opposed to any concentration of power (monopolies) provided it is brought about through non-coercive means.[34]

Non-propertarian libertarian philosophies hold that liberty is the absence of any form of authority and argue that a society based on freedom and equality can be achieved through abolishing authoritarian institutions that control certain means of production and subordinate the majority to an owning class or political and economic elite.[35] Implicitly, it rejects any authority of private property and thus holds that it is not legitimate for someone to claim private ownership of any resources to the detriment of others.[36][37][38][39] Libertarian socialism is a group of political philosophies that promote a non-hierarchical, non-bureaucratic, stateless society without private property in the means of production. The term libertarian socialism is also used to differentiate this philosophy from state socialism.[40][41][42][43] Libertarian socialists generally place their hopes in decentralized means of direct democracy such as libertarian municipalism, citizens' assemblies, trade unions and workers' councils.[44]

Anarchist–minarchist distinction

Libertarians differ on whether government is desirable. Some favor the existence of states and see them as necessary while others favor stateless societies and view the state as being undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful.[45][46]

Supporters of government argue that having defense and courts controlled by the market is an inherent miscarriage of justice because it turns justice into a commodity, thereby conflating justice with economic power.[47] Anarchists argue that having defense and courts controlled by the state is both immoral and an inefficient means of achieving both justice and security.[33][48] Libertarian socialists hold that liberty is incompatible with state action based on a class struggle analysis of the state.[49]

History

Age of Enlightenment

John Locke

During the 18th century, classical liberal ideas flourished in Europe and North America.[50][51] Libertarians of various schools were influenced by classical liberal ideas.[52]

John Locke greatly influenced both libertarianism and the modern world in his writings published before and after the English Revolution of 1688, especially A Letter Concerning Toleration (1667), Two Treatises of Government (1689) and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690). In the latter he established the basis of liberal political theory: that people's rights existed before government; that the purpose of government is to protect personal and property rights; that people may dissolve governments that do not do so; and that representative government is the best form to protect rights.[53] The United States Declaration of Independence was inspired by Locke in its statement: "to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it…"[54]

According to Murray Rothbard the libertarian creed emerged from the classical liberal challenges to an "absolute central State and a king ruling by divine right on top of an older, restrictive web of feudal land monopolies and urban guild controls and restrictions", the mercantilism of a bureaucratic warfaring state allied with privileged merchants. The object of classical liberals was individual liberty in the economy, in personal freedoms and civil liberty, separation of state and religion, and peace as an alternative to imperial aggrandizement. He cites Locke's contemporaries, the Levellers, who held similar views. Also influential were the English "Cato's Letters" during the early 1700s, reprinted eagerly by American colonists who already were free of European aristocracy and feudal land monopolies.[54]

In January of 1776, only two years after coming to America from England, Thomas Paine published his pamphlet "Common Sense" calling for independence for the colonies.[55] Paine promoted classical liberal ideas in clear, concise language that allowed the general public to understand the debates among the political elites.[56] Common Sense was immensely popular in disseminating these ideas[57], selling hundreds of thousands of copies.[58] Paine later would write the Rights of Man and The Age of Reason and participate in the French Revolution.[55]

In 1793, William Godwin wrote a libertarian philosophical treatise, Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and its Influence on Morals and Happiness, which criticized ideas of human rights and of society by contract based on vague promises. He took classical liberalism to its logical anarchic conclusion by rejecting all political institutions, law, government, and apparatus of coercion, as well as all political protest and insurrection. Instead of institutionalized justice he proposed that people influence one and other to moral goodness through informal reasoned persuasion, including in the associations they joined, and that this would facilitate human happiness.[59][60]

Nineteenth century

Individualist anarchism

Josiah Warren

During the 19th century a tradition of individualist anarchism developed that continued into and influenced 20th century libertarianism. Benjamin Tucker, Lysander Spooner, Ezra Heywood, William B. Greene, J.K. Ingalls, and Stephen Pearl Andrews opposed the idea of equalitarian conformity. They supported a world free of the state and monopolistic privileges, where individuals were free to trade. They were influenced by individualist German philosophers like Johann Gottleib Fichte, Max Stirner and Friedrich Nietzsche.[61] They also were influenced by Britain's Herbert Spencer and France's Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.[62]

Josiah Warren's individualistic philosophy arose from rejection of Robert Owen's failed cooperative movement in the 1820s, of which he was a participant. Of it, he wrote: "It seemed that the difference of opinion, tastes, and purposes increased just in proportion to the demand for conformity […] It appeared that it was nature's own inherent law of diversity that had conquered us […] our 'united interests' were directly at war with the individualities of persons and circumstances and the instinct of self-preservation". Warren even rejected community of property which he considered "doomed to failure because of the individuality of the persons involved in such an experiment."[63]

For American anarchist historian Eunice Minette Schuster, American individualist anarchism "stresses the isolation of the individual—his right to his own tools, his mind, his body, and to the products of his labor. To the artist who embraces this philosophy it is 'aesthetic' anarchism, to the reformer, ethical anarchism, to the independent mechanic, economic anarchism."[64]

Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862) was an important early influence in individualist anarchist thought in the United States and Europe. Thoreau was an American author, poet, naturalist, tax resister, surveyor, philosopher, and leading transcendentalist best known for his book Walden and his essay Civil Disobedience, an argument for individual resistance and moral opposition to an unjust state.[65] He originated the phrase "that government is best which governs less" and wrote "this government of itself never furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of the way."[66]

Benjamin Tucker's Liberty.

In the late nineteenth century individualist anarchism was expressed through influential writer Benjamin R. Tucker's periodical Liberty (1881-1908), which Wendy McElroy calls a “textbook of libertarian culture of the late nineteenth century.” It debated issues among the various strains of individualist anarchism in the Americas and Europe.[62] Tucker himself had a "passionate belief in the moral illegitimacy of the state", which premise he often followed to its uncomfortable conclusions.[66] "When was widely criticized, Tucker enthusiastically endorsed the poem, urging all of his subscribers to read it. Tucker, in fact, published an American edition. From its early championing of Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass, to it's printing of Oscar Wilde's plea for penal reform called "The Ballad of Reading Gaol", to a series of short stories by Francis du Bosque in its last issues, Liberty was a vehicle of controversial, avant-garde literature."[67]

An important concern for American individualist anarchism was free love. Free love particularly stressed women's rights since most sexual laws discriminated against women: for example, marriage laws and anti-birth control measures.[68] It produced a number of important publications like Lucifer the Lightbearer (1883–1907)[69], The Word (1872–1890, 1892–1893) and Free Society.[68]

"Freethought" was an anti-christian, anti-clerical movement whose purpose was to make the individual politically and spiritually free to decide on religious matters. The church was seen as a repressive ally of the state. A number of contributors to Liberty were prominent figures in both freethought and individualist anarchism.[62] Freethought was important in European individualist anarchism and it emphasized criticism of religious dogmas and of the church.[70]

Charles-Auguste Bontemps and others were active in French individualist anarchism. Their theoretical positions and practices were iconoclastic and scandalous, even within libertarian circles, including nudist naturism, defense of birth control and the idea of 'unions of egoists' solely for sexual purposes. Spanish individualist anarchists were influenced by American and French theorists, and practiced by individuals like Dorado Montero, Ricardo Mella, Federico Urales and J. Elizalde.[71]

Mutualism

Mutualism is a libertarian socialist school of thought most often with the mid-19th century writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.[72][73] Proudhon acknowledged that principles of competition and solidarity were in conflict but stated that society would find the “most libertarian means possible” to deal with the tension between freedom and order.[74] Proudhon proposed spontaneous order, whereby organization emerges without central authority, a "positive anarchy" where order arises when everybody does "what he wishes and only what he wishes."[75][76] He saw that every society has libertarian and authoritarian tendencies and that conflicts could be resolved by independent arbitrators or federations.[77][78] Mutualism has been retrospectively characterised as ideologically situated between individualist and collectivist forms of anarchism.[79]

Georgism

In the late nineteenth century, the libertarian philosophy of Georgism became influential among many libertarians, particularly among American libertarians. The Georgist philosophy is based on the writings of the economist Henry George (1839–1897), and is usually associated with the idea of a single tax on the value of land. Georgists argue that a tax on land value is economically efficient, fair and equitable; and that it can generate sufficient revenue so that other taxes, which are less fair and efficient (such as taxes on production, sales and income), can be reduced or eliminated.[80]

Libertarian communism

August 17, 1860 edition of libertarian Communist publication Le Libertaire edited by Joseph Déjacque.

Anarchist communist philosopher Joseph Déjacque was the first person to describe himself as "libertarian".[81] Unlike mutualist anarchist philosopher Pierre Joseph Proudhon, he argued that, "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature."[82][83] According to anarchist historian Max Nettlau, the first use of the term "libertarian communism" was in November 1880, when a French anarchist congress employed it to more clearly identify its doctrines.[84] The French anarchist journalist Sébastien Faure started the weekly paper Le Libertaire (The Libertarian) in 1895.[85]

In 1926, a group of exiled Russian anarchists in France, the Delo Truda (Workers' Cause) group, published a pamphlet titled The Organizational Platform of the Libertarian Communists.[86] The term anarchist communism has been described as "libertarian."[87][88]

Gruppo Comunista Anarchico di Firenze held that during early twentieth century, the terms libertarian communism and anarchist communism became synonymous within the international anarchist movement as a result of the close connection they had in Spain (see Anarchism in Spain) (with libertarian communism becoming the prevalent term).[89] Murray Bookchin wrote that the Spanish libertarian movement of the Spanish Revolution of the mid-1930s was unique because its workers’ control and collectives - which came out of a three generation “massive libertarian movement” - divided the “republican” camp and challenged the Marxists. Urban anarchists’ created libertarian communist forms of organization which evolved into the Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (“CNT”), a syndicalist union providing the infrastructure for a libertarian society. Also formed were local bodies to administer of social and economic life on a decentralized libertarian basis. Much of the infrastructure was destroyed during the 1930s Spanish Civil War against authoritarian and fascist forces.[90]

The Manifesto of Libertarian Communism was written in 1953 by Georges Fontenis for the Federation Communiste Libertaire of France. It is one of the key texts of the anarchist-communist current known as platformism.[91]

Twentieth century

European individualist anarchism

Autonomie Individuelle was a French individualist anarchist publication that ran from 1887 to 1888 and was edited by Jean-Baptiste Louiche, Charles Schæffer and Georges Deherme.[92] This tradition continued with such intellectuals as Albert Libertad, André Lorulot, Emile Armand, Victor Serge, Zo d'Axa and Rirette Maitrejean, who developed the theory in the main individualist anarchist journal in France, L’Anarchie, in 1905. Outside this journal, Han Ryner wrote Petit Manuel individualiste in 1903, and Zo d'Axa created the journal L'EnDehors in 1891.

Anarchist naturism was promoted by Henri Zisly, Emile Gravelle,[93] and Georges Butaud. Anarcho-naturism advocated vegetarianism, nudism, hiking and an ecological worldview both within and outside of anarchist groups.[94][95] Freethought as a philosophical position and as activism was important in European individualist anarchism and it emphasized criticism of religious dogmas and of the church.[96] This tendency continued in French individualist anarchism in the work and activism of Charles-Auguste Bontemps and others. "In this sense, the theoretical positions and the vital experiences of french individualism are deeply iconoclastic and scandalous, even within libertarian circles. The call of nudist naturism, the strong defence of birth control methods, the idea of 'unions of egoists' with the sole justification of sexual practices, that will try to put in practice, not without difficulties, will establish a way of thought and action, and will result in sympathy within some, and a strong rejection within others."[71]

In Italy, individualist anarchism had a strong tendency towards illegalism and violent propaganda by the deed similar to French individualist anarchism but perhaps more extreme.[97] The theoretical seeds of current insurrectionary anarchism were already laid out at the end of the 19th century in a combination of the individualist anarchist criticism of permanent groups and organization, with a socialist class struggle worldview.[98] During the early 20th century, the intellectual work of individualist anarchist Renzo Novatore, who collaborated in the individualist anarchist journal Iconoclasta! alongside the young stirnerite illegalist Bruno Filippi,[99] became important.

Spain received the influence of American individualist anarchism, but was most importantly related to the French currents. At the turn of the century, individualism in Spain took force through the efforts of people such as Dorado Montero, Ricardo Mella, Federico Urales and J. Elizalde, who translated French and American individualist works.[71] Important in this respect were also magazines such as La Idea Libre, La revista blanca, Etica, Iniciales, Al margen and Nosotros. In Germany, the Scottish-German John Henry McKay became the most important propagandist for individualist anarchist ideas. Adolf Brand (1874–1945), a German writer, stirnerite anarchist and pioneering campaigner for the acceptance of male bisexuality and homosexuality, published a German homosexual periodical, Der Eigene, in 1896. The Irish anarchist writer of the Decadent movement, Oscar Wilde, influenced individualist anarchists such as Renzo Novatore[100] and gained the admiration of Benjamin Tucker.[101]

Anarchist uprisings of the 1910s

Anarchists participated alongside the Bolsheviks in both the February and October revolutions, and were initially enthusiastic about the Bolshevik revolution.[102] However, following a political falling-out with the Bolsheviks by the anarchists and other left-wing opposition, a conflict arose that culminated in the 1921 Kronstadt rebellion, which the new government repressed. Anarchists in central Russia were either imprisoned, driven underground, or joined the victorious Bolsheviks; the anarchists from Petrograd and Moscow fled to the Ukraine.[103] There, in the Free Territory, they fought in the civil war against the Whites (a grouping of monarchists and other opponents of the October Revolution) and then the Bolsheviks as part of the Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine led by Nestor Makhno, who established an anarchist society in the region for a number of months. Expelled American anarchists Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman were amongst those agitating in response to Bolshevik policy and the suppression of the Kronstadt uprising, before they left Russia.

The victory of the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution and the resulting Russian Civil War did serious damage to anarchist movements internationally. Many workers and activists saw Bolshevik success as setting an example; Communist parties grew at the expense of anarchism and other socialist movements. In France and the United States, for example, members of the major syndicalist movements of the CGT and IWW left the organizations and joined the Communist International.[104] In Paris, the Dielo Truda group of Russian anarchist exiles, which included Nestor Makhno, concluded that anarchists needed to develop new forms of organization in response to the structures of Bolshevism. Their 1926 manifesto, called the Organizational Platform of the General Union of Anarchists (Draft),[105] was supported.

The revolutionary wave of 1917–23 saw the active participation of anarchists in varying degrees of protagonism. In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic, the anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell, and Erich Mühsam had important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist structures.[106][107] In the Italian events known as the biennio rosso, the anarcho-syndicalist trade union Unione Sindacale Italiana "grew to 800,000 members and the influence of the Italian Anarchist Union (20,000 members plus Umanita Nova, its daily paper) grew accordingly... Anarchists were the first to suggest occupying workplaces."[108] In the Mexican Revolution, the Mexican Liberal Party was established and, during the early 1910s, it led a series of military offensives culminating in the conquest and occupation of certain towns and districts in Baja California under the leadership of anarcho-communist Ricardo Flores Magón.[109]

Conflicts with fascist regimes

In the 1920s and 1930s, the rise of fascism in Europe transformed anarchism's conflict with the state. Italy saw the first struggles between anarchists and fascists. Italian anarchists played a key role in the anti-fascist organisation Arditi del Popolo, which was strongest in areas with anarchist traditions, and achieved some success in their activism, such as repelling Blackshirts in the anarchist stronghold of Parma in August 1922.[110] The veteran Italian anarchist, Luigi Fabbri, was one of the first critical theorists of fascism, describing it as "the preventive counter-revolution." In France, where the far-right leagues came close to insurrection in the February 1934 riots, anarchists divided over a united front policy.[111]

In Spain, the CNT initially refused to join a popular front electoral alliance, and abstention by CNT supporters led to a right-wing election victory. But in 1936, the CNT changed its policy, and anarchist votes helped bring the popular front back to power. Months later, the former ruling class responded with an attempted coup, causing the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939).[112] In response to the army rebellion, an anarchist-inspired movement of peasants and workers, supported by armed militias, took control of Barcelona and of large areas of rural Spain where they collectivized the land.[113]

Market liberals

During the early 20th century, modern liberalism in the United States began to take a more state-oriented approach to economic regulation. While conservatism in Europe continued to mean conserving hierarchical class structures through state control of society and the economy, some conservatives in the United States began to refer to conserving traditions of liberty. This was especially true of the Old Right, which opposed the New Deal and U.S. military interventions in World War I and World War II. Those who held to the earlier liberal views began to call themselves market liberals, classical liberals or libertarians to distinguish themselves. The Austrian School of economics, influenced by Frédéric Bastiat and later by Ludwig von Mises, also had an impact on what is now right-libertarianism.

Anarchism

Anarchism was influential in the counterculture of the 1960s and anarchists actively participated in the students and workers revolts of 1968.[114][115][116][117]

In 1968 in Carrara, Italy, the International of Anarchist Federations was founded during an international anarchist conference held by the three existing European federations of France (the Fédération Anarchiste), the Federazione Anarchica Italiana of Italy, the Iberian Anarchist Federation, and the Bulgarian federation in French exile.[118][119]

In the United Kingdom in the 1970s, this was associated with the punk rock movement, as exemplified by bands such as Crass and the Sex Pistols.[120] The housing and employment crisis in most of Western Europe led to the formation of communes and squatter movements like that of Barcelona, Spain. In Denmark, squatters occupied a disused military base and declared it Freetown Christiania, an autonomous haven in central Copenhagen.

Libertarian Marxism

Libertarian Marxism refers to a broad scope of economic and political philosophies that emphasize the anti-authoritarian aspects of Marxism. Early currents of libertarian Marxism, known as left communism,[121] emerged in opposition to Marxism–Leninism[122] and its derivatives, such as Stalinism, Maoism, and Trotskyism.[123] Libertarian Marxism is also critical of reformist positions, such as those held by social democrats.[124] Libertarian Marxist currents often draw from Marx and Engels' later works, specifically the Grundrisse and The Civil War in France;[125] emphasizing the Marxist belief in the ability of the working class to forge its own destiny without the need for a revolutionary party or state to mediate or aid its liberation.[126] Along with anarchism, Libertarian Marxism is one of the main currents of libertarian socialism.[127]

Libertarian Marxism includes such currents as council communism, left communism, Socialisme ou Barbarie Lettrism/Situationism and operaismo/autonomism, and New Left.[128] Libertarian Marxism has often had a strong influence on both post-left and social anarchists. Notable theorists of libertarian Marxism have included Anton Pannekoek, Raya Dunayevskaya, CLR James, Antonio Negri, Cornelius Castoriadis, Maurice Brinton, Guy Debord, Daniel Guérin, Ernesto Screpanti, and Raoul Vaneigem. In 1969 French platformist anarcho-communist Daniel Guerin published an essay in 1969 called "Libertarian Marxism?" in which he dealt with the debate between Karl Marx and Mikhail Bakunin at the First International and afterwards he suggested that "Libertarian marxism rejects determinism and fatalism, giving the greator place to individual will, intuition, imagination, reflex speeds, and to the deep instincts of the masses, which are more far-seeing in hours of crisis than the reasonings of the ‘elites’; libertarian marxism thinks of the effects of surprise, provocation and boldness, refuses to be cluttered and paralysed by a heavy ‘scientific’ apparatus, doesn’t equivocate or bluff, and guards itself from adventurism as much as from fear of the unknown."[129]

In the United States

Main article: Libertarianism in the United States

In the 1950s, many with "Old Right" or classical liberal beliefs in the United States began to describe themselves as libertarian. Arizona United States Senator Barry Goldwater's right-libertarian leaning challenge to authority also influenced the U.S. libertarian movement.[130] During the 1960s, the Vietnam War divided right-libertarians, anarchists, and conservatives. Right-libertarians and left-libertarians opposed to the war joined the draft resistance and peace movements and began founding their own publications, like Murray Rothbard's The Libertarian Forum[131] and organizations like the Radical Libertarian Alliance[132] and the Society for Individual Liberty.[133] An increase in popular interest in anarchism occurred in western nations during the 1960s and 1970s.[134] In 1971, a small group of Americans led by David Nolan formed the U.S. Libertarian Party. The party has run a presidential candidate every election year since 1972. Over the years, dozens of capitalism-supporting libertarian political parties have been formed worldwide. Educational organizations like the Center for Libertarian Studies and the Cato Institute were formed in the 1970s, and others have been created since then.

In the 1950s, Russian-American novelist Ayn Rand became one of the most influential thinkers among conservatives and right-libertarians. Rand developed a philosophical system called Objectivism and expressed her ideas in her novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, as well as in other works. She further elaborated on her philosophy in her periodicals The Objectivist Newsletter, The Objectivist, and The Ayn Rand Letter, and in non-fiction books such as Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology and The Virtue of Selfishness.[135] Despite her influence on libertarian thought, she adamantly rejected the label of libertarian and denounced non-Objectivist libertarians. Philosopher John Hospers, a one-time member of Rand's inner circle, proposed a non-initiation of force principle to unite both groups; this statement later became a required "pledge" for candidates of the Libertarian Party, and Hospers himself became its first presidential candidate in 1972.

Right-libertarianism gained significant recognition in academia with the publication of Harvard University professor Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia in 1974. The book advocated support for government on the grounds that it was an inevitable phenomenon. It was also written to critique A Theory of Justice by John Rawls. Anarchy, State, and Utopia won a National Book Award in 1975.[136][137]

Proponents of the free market perspectives argue that free-market capitalist libertarianism has been successfully propagated beyond the United States since the 1970s via think tanks and political parties.[12]

Twenty-first century

In the early 21st century, libertarian socialists became active in anti-war, anti-capitalist, and anti-globalisation movements. Anarchists became known for their black bloc protests against the World Trade Organization conference in Seattle in 1999, other meetings of the World Trade Organization, the Group of Eight, and the World Economic Forum.[138]

In the United States, polls (circa 2006) find that the views and voting habits of between 10 and 20 percent (and increasing) of voting age Americans may be classified as "fiscally conservative and socially liberal, or libertarian."[17][139] This is based on pollsters and researchers defining libertarian views as fiscally conservative and socially liberal (based on the common US meanings of the terms) and against government intervention in economic affairs, and for expansion of personal freedoms.[17] Through 20 polls on this topic spanning 13 years, Gallup found that voters who are libertarian on the political spectrum ranged from 17–23% of the US electorate.[140] Most of these vote for Republican and Democratic (not Libertarian) party candidates.[141] A 2011 Reason-Rupe poll found that among those who self-identified as Tea Party supporters, 41 percent leaned libertarian and 59 percent socially conservative.[142] In additional anti-war presidential candidates - Libertarian Republican Ron Paul and Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson - raised millions of dollars and garnered millions of votes despite opposition to their obtaining ballot access by Democrats and Republicans.[143]

Libertarian organizations

Since the 1950s, many American libertarian organizations have adopted a free market stance, as well as supporting civil liberties and non-interventionist foreign policies. These include the Ludwig von Mises Institute, the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE), Center for Libertarian Studies, the Cato Institute, and the International Society for Individual Liberty (ISIL). The activist Free State Project, formed in 2001, works to bring 20,000 libertarians to New Hampshire to influence state policy.[144] Active student organizations include Students for Liberty and Young Americans for Liberty.

A number of countries have libertarian parties that run candidates for political office. In the United States, the Libertarian Party of the United States was formed in 1972. The Libertarian Party is the third largest[145][146] American political party, with over 370,000 registered voters in the 35 states that allow registration as a Libertarian[147] and has hundreds of party candidates elected or appointed to public office.[148]

Current international anarchist federations which sometimes identify themselves as libertarian include the International of Anarchist Federations, the International Workers' Association, and International Libertarian Solidarity. The largest organised anarchist movement today is in Spain, in the form of the Confederación General del Trabajo (CGT) and the CNT. CGT membership was estimated to be around 100,000 for 2003.[149] Other active syndicalist movements include, in Sweden, the Central Organisation of the Workers of Sweden and the Swedish Anarcho-syndicalist Youth Federation; the CNT-AIT in France;[150] the Union Sindicale Italiana in Italy; in the US, Workers Solidarity Alliance; and in the UK, Solidarity Federation. The revolutionary industrial unionist Industrial Workers of the World, claiming 2,000 paying members, and the International Workers Association, an anarcho-syndicalist successor to the First International, also remain active.

Influential libertarian philosophers

See also Category:Libertarian theorists and Timeline of libertarian thinkers

Criticisms

Criticisms of libertarianism include moral criticisms and pragmatic criticisms.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Friedman, David D. (2008). "libertarianism," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, Abstract.
  2. ^ Vallentyne, Peter. "Libertarianism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University. Retrieved November 20, 2011.
  3. ^ Woodcock, George. Anarchism: a history of libertarian ideas and movements. Petersborough, Ontario: Broadview press. pp. 11–31 especially 18. ISBN 1-55111-629-4.
  4. ^ a b Roderick T. Long (1998). "Towards a Libertarian Theory of Class" (PDF). Social Philosophy and Policy. 15 (2): 303–349: at p. 304. doi:10.1017/S0265052500002028.
  5. ^ Watts, Duncan (2002). Understanding American government and politics: a guide for A2 politics students. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. p. 246.
  6. ^ "Libertarian Party 2010 Platform". The Libertarian Party. May 2010. p. 1. Retrieved 24 September 2010.
  7. ^ Hamowy, Ronald (editor) (2008). "Sociology and Libertarianism". The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications. pp. 480–482. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4. {{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)
  8. ^ Vallentyne, Peter (September 5, 2002). "Libertarianism". In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved March 5, 2010. Both endorse full self-ownership, but they differ with respect to the powers agents have to appropriate unappropriated natural resources (land, air, water, etc.). Right-libertarianism holds that typically such resources may be appropriated by the first person who discovers them, mixes her labor with them, or merely claims them – without the consent of others, and with little or no payment to them. Left-libertarianism, by contrast, holds that unappropriated natural resources belong to everyone in some egalitarian manner. It can, for example, require those who claim rights over natural resources to make a payment to others for the value of those rights. This can provide the basis for a kind of egalitarian redistribution {{cite encyclopedia}}: Check date values in: |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  9. ^ Otero, Carlos Peregrin (2003). "Introduction to Chomsky's Social Theory". In Carlos Peregrin Otero (ed.). Radical priorities. Noam Chomsky (book author) (3rd ed.). Oakland, California: AK Press. p. 26. ISBN 1-902593-69-3.; Chomsky, Noam (2003). Carlos Peregrin Otero (ed.). Radical priorities (3rd ed.). Oakland, California: AK Press. pp. 227–228. ISBN 1-902593-69-3.
  10. ^ Vallentyne, Peter (September 5, 2002). "Libertarianism". In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved March 5, 2010. Libertarianism is committed to full self-ownership. A distinction can be made, however, between right-libertarianism and left-libertarianism, depending on the stance taken on how natural resources can be owned {{cite encyclopedia}}: Check date values in: |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  11. ^ a b
    • Chomsky, Noam (February 23, 2002). "The Week Online Interviews Chomsky". Z Magazine. Z Communications. Retrieved 21 November 2011. The term libertarian as used in the US means something quite different from what it meant historically and still means in the rest of the world. Historically, the libertarian movement has been the anti-statist wing of the socialist movement. Socialist anarchism was libertarian socialism. In the US, which is a society much more dominated by business, the term has a different meaning. It means eliminating or reducing state controls, mainly controls over private tyrannies. Libertarians in the US don't say let's get rid of corporations. It is a sort of ultra-rightism.
    • Colin Ward (2004), Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 62. "For a century, anarchists have used the word 'libertarian' as a synonym for 'anarchist', both as a noun and an adjective. The celebrated anarchist journal Le Libertaire was founded in 1896. However, much more recently the word has been appropriated by various American free-market philosophers..."
    • Fernandez, Frank (2001), Cuban Anarchism. The History of a Movement, Charles Bufe translator, Tucson, Arizona: See Sharp Press, p. 9. "Thus, in the United States, the once exceedingly useful term "libertarian" has been hijacked by egotists who are in fact enemies of liberty in the full sense of the word."
  12. ^ a b Steven Teles and Daniel A. Kenney, chapter "Spreading the Word: The diffusion of American Conservativsm in Europe and beyond," (p. 136-169) in Growing apart?: America and Europe in the twenty-first century by Sven Steinmo, Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN , The chapter discusses how libertarian ideas have been more successful at spreading worldwide than social conservative ideas. Cite error: The named reference "teles2008diffusion" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  13. ^ Anthony Gregory, Real World Politics and Radical Libertarianism, LewRockwell.com, April 24, 2007.
  14. ^ David Boaz, Preface for the Japanese Edition of Libertarianism: A Primer, reprinted at Cato.org, November 21, 1998.
  15. ^ Radicals for Capitalism (Book Review), New York Post, February 4, 2007.
  16. ^ Moseley, Daniel (June 25, 2011). "What is Libertarianism?". Basic Income Studies. 6 (2): 2. Retrieved 15 November 2011.
  17. ^ a b c The Libertarian Vote by David Boaz and David Kirby, Cato Institute, October 18, 2006
  18. ^ Ronald Hamowy, The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, Chapter: "Foreign policy", pp. 177-180.
  19. ^ Edward A. Olsen, US National Defense for the Twenty-First Century: The Grand Exit Strategy, Taylor & Francis, 2002, p. 182, ISBN 0714681407, 9780714681405.
  20. ^ David Boaz (1998). Libertarianism A Primer. London, United Kingdom: The Free Press. pp. 22–25. ISBN 0-684-84768-X.
  21. ^ "Libertarianism". Oxford English Dictionary (3 ed.). 2010. libertarian A.1.(subscription required)
  22. ^ William Belsham (1789). Essays. C. Dilly. p. 11Original from the University of Michigan, digitized May 21, 2007{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  23. ^
  24. ^ Nettlau, Max (1996). A Short History of Anarchism (in English and translated). London: Freedom Press. p. 162. ISBN 978-0-900384-89-9. OCLC 37529250.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  25. ^ Burns, Jennifer (2009). Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-19-532487-7.
  26. ^ a b Rothbard, Murray N. (1989). For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto. New York: Collier Books. ISBN 0-02-074690-3.
  27. ^ Bevir, Mark. Encyclopedia of Political Theory. SAGE, 2010. p. 811
  28. ^ a b Wolff, Jonathan. "Libertarianism, Utility, and Economic Competition" (PDF). Virginia Law Review. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  29. ^ "Contractarianism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California. 2007-04-04.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  30. ^ Anthony de Jasay (1996). "Hayek: Some Missing Pieces" (PDF). The Review of Austrian Economics. 9 (1): 107–18. ISSN 0889-3047.
  31. ^ Hardy Bouillon, Harmut Kliemt (2007). "Foreword". Ordered Anarchy: Jasay and his surroundings. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing. p. xiii. ISBN 0-7546-6113-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  32. ^ B. Franks (2003). "Direct action ethic" (PDF). Anarchist Studies. 11 (1): 13–41, 24–25.
  33. ^ a b Rothbard, Murray (1998). The Ethics of Liberty. New York: NYU Press. ISBN 978-0814775066.
  34. ^ Ludwig, von Mises (2007). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. ISBN 978-0865976313.
  35. ^ Mendes, Manuel da Silva (2011). Socialismo libertario ou Anarchismo. Historia e doutrina (in Portuguese). Adegi Graphics LLC. ASIN B004IKWRH2.[page needed]
  36. ^ Vallentyne, Peter (September 5, 2002). "Libertarianism". In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved March 5, 2010. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Check date values in: |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  37. ^ Will Kymlicka (1995). "libertarianism, left-". In Ted Honderich (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-866132-0.[page needed]
  38. ^ Peter Vallentyne, Hillel Steiner, ed. (2000). Left-libertarianism and its critics: the contemporary debate. New York: Palgrave (St. Martin's Press). p. 393. ISBN 0-312-23699-9.[page needed]
  39. ^ Eric Mack and Gerald F Gauss (2004). "Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism: The Liberty Tradition". In Gerald F. Gaus, Chandran Kukathas (ed.). Handbook of Political Theory. Sage Publications. pp. 115–131, found at 128. ISBN 978-0-7619-6787-3.
  40. ^ Paul Zarembka. Transitions in Latin America and in Poland and Syria. Emerald Group Publishing, 2007. p. 25
  41. ^ Guerin, Daniel (2011) [1970] Anarchism: from theory to practice [originally published as French: Anarchisme, de la doctrine à l'action] reprinted online: libcom.org [first published in English: New York: Monthly Review Press], §1 sub-§ "A Matter of Words." "At the end of the century in France, Sebastien Faure took up a word originated in 1858 by one Joseph Dejacque to make it the title of a journal, Le Libertaire. Today the terms "anarchist" and "libertarian" have become interchangeable. Some contemporary anarchists have tried to clear up the misunderstanding by adopting a more explicit term: they align themselves with libertarian socialism or communism or as a synonym for anarchism.
  42. ^ Ostergaard, Geoffrey. "Anarchism". Limited A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Blackwell Publishing, 1991. p. 21.
  43. ^ Chomsky, Noam and Carlos Peregrín Otero. Language and Politics. AK Press, 2004, p. 739
  44. ^ Rocker, Rudolf (2004). Anarcho-Syndicalism: Theory and Practice. Oakland, California: AK Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-1-902593-92-0.
  45. ^ Malatesta, Errico. "Towards Anarchism". MAN!. Los Angeles: International Group of San Francisco. OCLC 3930443."Anarchism". The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2005. p. 14. Anarchism is the view that a society without the state, or government, is both possible and desirable. The following sources cite anarchism as a political philosophy: Mclaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority. Aldershot: Ashgate. p. 59. ISBN 0-7546-6196-2. Johnston, R. (2000). The Dictionary of Human Geography. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. p. 24. ISBN 0-631-20561-6.
  46. ^ Slevin, Carl. "Anarchism." The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Ed. Iain McLean and Alistair McMillan. Oxford University Press, 2003.
  47. ^ Holcombe, Randall G. "Government: Unnecessary but Inevitable" (PDF). The Independent Review. 8 (3): 325–342 at pages 326–328 (armed forces), 330–331 (market failure in protective services), 332–333 (police).
  48. ^ Friedman, David (1989). The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism. La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0812690699.
  49. ^ Lewis Call (2002), Postmodern anarchism, Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, p. 66–68.
  50. ^ Adrina Michelle Garbooshian, The Concept of Human Dignity in the French and American Enlightenments: Religion, Virtue, Liberty, ProQuest, 2006, p. 472, ISBN 0542851601, 9780542851605; quote: "Influenced by Locke and Smith, certain segments of society affirmed classical liberalism, with a libertarian bent."
  51. ^ Paul A. Cantor, The Invisible Hand in Popular Culture: Liberty Vs. Authority in American Film and TV, University Press of Kentucky, 2012, p. xiii, ISBN 081314082X, 9780813140827 ; Quote: "[T]he roots of libertarianism lie in...the classical liberal tradition."
  52. ^ Carlos Peregrin Otero, editor, Noam Chomsky: critical assessments, Volumes 2–3, Taylor & Francis US, 1994, p. 617, ISBN 0-415-10694-X, 9780415106948.
  53. ^ David Boaz, The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Writings from Lao Tzu to Milton Friedman, Simon and Schuster, 2010, p. 123, ISBN 1439118337, 9781439118337
  54. ^ a b Murray Rothbard, The Libertarian Heritage: The American Revolution and Classical Liberalism, excerpted from Rothbard's For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, 1973; published at LewRockwell.com, 2006.
  55. ^ a b Charles T.Sprading, Liberty and the Great Libertarians, 1913; republished 1995 by Ludwig von Mises Institute, p. 74, ISBN 1610161076, 9781610161077
  56. ^ David C. Hoffman, "Paine and Prejudice: Rhetorical Leadership through Perceptual Framing in Common Sense," Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Fall 2006, Vol. 9 Issue 3, pp 373–410
  57. ^ Pauline Maier, American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence (New York: Knopf, 1997), 90–91.
  58. ^ Hitchens, Christopher (2006). Thomas Paine's Rights of Man. Grove Press. p. 37. ISBN 0-8021-4383-0.
  59. ^ Ian Ousby, The Cambridge Guide to Literature in English, Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 305, ISBN 0521440866, 9780521440868
  60. ^ Godwin, William. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and its Influence on Modern Morals and Happiness. G.G. and J. Robinson. OCLC 2340417.
  61. ^ Chris Matthew Sciabarra, Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism, Penn State Press, 2000, p. 196., ISBN 0271020490, 9780271020495
  62. ^ a b c Wendy McElroy, "The culture of individualist anarchist in Late-nineteenth century America", Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3, (Summer 1981), at Ludwig von Mises Institute website.
  63. ^ Butler, Ann Caldwell. "Josiah Warren and the Sovereignty of the Individual". Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. IV, No. 4 (Fall 1980)
  64. ^ Eunice Minette Schuster, Native American Anarchism: A Study of Left-Wing American Individualism', Da Capo Press, 1932, p. __[verification needed].
  65. ^ Charles T. Sprading, Liberty and the Great Libertarians, Golden Press, Los Angeles, 1912; reprinted by Ludwig von Mises Institute, p. 191, ISBN 1610161076, 9781610161077
  66. ^ a b Brian Doherty, Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement, PublicAffairs, 2009, p 37, ISBN 0786731885, 9780786731886
  67. ^ Wendy McElroy, "Benjamin Tucker, Individualism, & Liberty: Not the Daughter but the Mother of Order", from the Online Library of Liberty.
  68. ^ a b Wendy McElroy, The Free Love Movement and Radical Individualism, The Libertarian Enterprise, Number 19, December 1, 1996.
  69. ^ Joanne E. Passet, "Power through Print: Lois Waisbrooker and Grassroots Feminism," in: Women in Print: Essays on the Print Culture of American Women from the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, James Philip Danky and Wayne A. Wiegand, eds., Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press, 2006; pp. 229–250.
  70. ^ Xavier Diez. El anarquismo individualista en España (1923–1939) Virus Editorial. 2007. p. 143, translated quote: "Anticlericalism, just as in the rest of the libertarian movement, in another of the frequent elements which will gain relevance related to the measure in which the (French) Republic begins to have conflicts with the church..."
  71. ^ a b c "La insumisión voluntaria. El anarquismo individualista español durante la dictadura y la Segunda República" by Xavier Díez.[verification needed] Cite error: The named reference "frenchexperimentation" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  72. ^
    • "A libertarian socialist response to the 'big society'" in The Third Sector,
    Volume 1 of Dialogues in Critical Management Studies, Editors Richard Hull, Jane Gibbon, Oana Branzei, Emerald Group Publishing, 2011, p. 125, ISBN 1780522800, 9781780522807
    • Fisher, Vardis. Libertarian and Mutualist Essays on Free Banking, Free Land and Individualism. Revisionist Press.
  73. ^ Edwards, Paul. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. p. 113.
  74. ^ Darrow Schecter, Radical Theories: Paths Beyond Marxism and Social Democracy, Volume 38 of Colloquia mathematica Societatis Janos Bolyai, Manchester University Press, 1994, P 53, ISBN 0719043859, 9780719043857
  75. ^ Proudhon, Solution to the Social Problem, ed. H. Cohen (New York: Vanguard Press, 1927), p. 45.
  76. ^ Rothbard, Murray. Concepts of the Role of Intellectuals in Social Change Toward Laissez Faire, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol IX No. 2 (Fall 1990)
  77. ^ David Goodway, For Anarchism: History, Theory and Practice, Taylor & Francis, 1989, p. 155, ISBN 0415029554, 9780415029551.
  78. ^ Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph (1979). The Principle of Federation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 0-8020-5458-7. The notion of 'anarchy' in politics is just as rational and positive as any other. It means that once industrial functions have taken over from political functions, then business transactions alone produce the social order.
  79. ^
    • Avrich, Paul. Anarchist Voices: An Oral History of Anarchism in America, Princeton University Press 1996 ISBN 0-691-04494-5, p. 6
    • Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, Blackwell Publishing 1991 ISBN 0-631-17944-5, p. 11.
    • George Woodcock in Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements also emphasized mutualism and individualist anarchism, according to John Curl, Ishmael Reed, For All the People: Uncovering the Hidden History of Cooperation, Cooperative Movements, and Communalism in America, PM Press, 2012, ISBN 1604867329, 9781604867329, p. 478
    • Woodcock, George. Anarchism: A History of Libertarian Ideas and Movements, Broadview Press, 2004, p. 20
  80. ^ Land Value Taxation: An Applied Analysis, William J. McCluskey, Riël C. D. Franzsen
  81. ^ Joseph Déjacque, De l'être-humain mâle et femelle – Lettre à P.J. Proudhon par Joseph Déjacque (in French)
  82. ^ Robert Graham, Anarchism – A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas – Volume One: From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939), Black Rose Books, 2005
  83. ^ "l'Echange", article in Le Libertaire no 6, September 21, 1858, New York. [1]
  84. ^ Nettlau, Max (1996). A Short History of Anarchism. Freedom Press. p. 145. ISBN 0-900384-89-1.
  85. ^ Nettlau, Max (1996). A Short History of Anarchism. Freedom Press. p. 162. ISBN 0-900384-89-1.
  86. ^ "The Organizational Platform of the Libertarian Communists" by Delo Truda
  87. ^ Alexander Berkman. "What Is Communist Anarchism?"
  88. ^ "Anarchist communism is also known as anarcho-communism, communist anarchism, or, sometimes, libertarian communism." from "Anarchist communism – an introduction" by Libcom.org
  89. ^ "Anarchist Communism & Libertarian Communism" by Gruppo Comunista Anarchico di Firenze. from "L'informatore di parte", No. 4, October 1979, quarterly journal of the Gruppo Comunista Anarchico di Firenze, on Libcom.org
  90. ^ Murray Bookchin, To Remember Spain: The Anarchist and Syndicalist Revolution of 1936, AK Press, 1994, p. 2-39, ISBN 1873176872, 9781873176870
  91. ^ "Manifesto of Libertarian Communism" by Georges Fontenis, on Libcom.org
  92. ^ Autonomie Individuelle (1887–1888)
  93. ^ The daily bleed
  94. ^ EL NATURISMO LIBERTARIO EN LA PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA (1890–1939) by Jose Maria Rosello
  95. ^ "Les anarchistes individualistes du début du siècle l'avaient bien compris, et intégraient le naturisme dans leurs préoccupations. Il est vraiment dommage que ce discours se soit peu à peu effacé, d'antan plus que nous assistons, en ce moment, à un retour en force du puritanisme (conservateur par essence).""Anarchisme et naturisme, aujourd'hui." by Cathy Ytak
  96. ^ "Anticlericalism, just as in the rest of the libertarian movement, in another of the frequent elements which will gain relevance related to the measure in which the (French) Republic begins to have conflicts with the church...Anti-clerical discourse, frequently called for by the french individualist André Lorulot, will have its impacts in Estudios (an Spanish individualist anarchist publication). There will be an attack on institutionalized religion for the responsibility that it had in the past on negative developments, for its irrationality which makes it a counterpoint of philosophical and scientific progress. There will be a criticism of proselitism and ideological manipulation which happens on both believers and agnostics." Xavier Diez. El anarquismo individualista en España (1923–1939) Virus Editorial. 2007. p. 143
  97. ^ "anarco-individualismo" in italian anarchopedia
  98. ^ "Essa trova soprattutto in America del Nord un notevole seguito per opera del Galleani che esprime una sintesi fra l'istanza puramente individualista di stampo anglosassone e americano (ben espressa negli scritti di Tucker) e quella profondamente socialista del movimento anarchico di lingua italiana. Questa commistione di elementi individualisti e comunisti – che caratterizza bene la corrente antiorganizzatrice – rappresenta lo sforzo di quanti avvertirono in modo estremamente sensibile l'invadente burocratismo che pervadeva il movimento operaio e socialista.""anarchismo insurrezionale" in italian anarchopedia
  99. ^ The rebel's dark laughter: the writings of Bruno Filippi
  100. ^ "We must kill the Christian philosophy in the most radical sense of the word. How much mostly goes sneaking inside the democratic civilization (this most cynically ferocious form of christian depravity) and it goes more towards the categorical negation of human Individuality. “Democracy! By now we have comprised it that it means all that says Oscar Wilde Democracy is the people who govern the people with blows of the club for love of the people”." "Towards the Hurricane" by Renzo Novatore
  101. ^ "When Oscar Wilde's plea for penal reform, The Ballad of Reading Gaol, was widely criticized, Tucker enthusiastically endorsed the poem, urging all of his subscribers to read it. Tucker, in fact, published an American edition. From its early championing of Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass to a series of short stories by Francis du Bosque in its last issues, Liberty was a vehicle of controversial, avant-garde literature.""Benjamin Tucker, Individualism, & Liberty: Not the Daughter but the Mother of Order" by Wendy McElroy
  102. ^ Dirlik, Arif (1991). Anarchism in the Chinese Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-07297-9.
  103. ^ Avrich, Paul (2006). The Russian Anarchists. Stirling: AK Press. p. 204. ISBN 1-904859-48-8.
  104. ^ Nomad, Max (1966). "The Anarchist Tradition". In Drachkovitch, Milorad M. (ed.). Revolutionary Internationals 1864 1943. Stanford University Press. p. 88. ISBN 0-8047-0293-4.
  105. ^ Dielo Trouda (2006) [1926]. Organizational Platform of the General Union of Anarchists (Draft). Italy: FdCA. Retrieved 2006-10-24.
  106. ^ "The Munich Soviet (or “Council Republic”) of 1919 exhibited certain features of the TAZ, even though – like most revolutions – its stated goals were not exactly “temporary.” Gustav Landauer's participation as Minister of Culture along with Silvio Gesell as Minister of Economics and other anti-authoritarian and extreme libertarian socialists such as the poet/playwrights Erich Mühsam and Ernst Toller, and Ret Marut (the novelist B. Traven), gave the Soviet a distinct anarchist flavor." Hakim Bey. "T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism"
  107. ^ "Die bayerische Revolution 1918/19. Die erste Räterepublik der Literaten"[dead link]
  108. ^ "1918–1921: The Italian factory occupations – Biennio Rosso" on Libcom.org
  109. ^ "The Magonista Revolt in Baja California Capitalist Conspiracy or Rebelion de los Pobres?" by Lawrence D. Taylor
  110. ^ Holbrow, Marnie, "Daring but Divided" (Socialist Review November 2002).
  111. ^ Berry, David. "Fascism or Revolution." Le Libertaire. August 1936.
  112. ^ Beevor, Antony (2006). The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936–1939. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-297-84832-5.
  113. ^ Bolloten, Burnett (1984-11-15). The Spanish Civil War: Revolution and Counterrevolution. University of North Carolina Press. p. 1107. ISBN 978-0-8078-1906-7. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  114. ^ "These groups had their roots in the anarchist resurgence of the nineteen sixties. Young militants finding their way to anarchism, often from the anti-bomb and anti-Vietnam war movements, linked up with an earlier generation of activists, largely outside the ossified structures of ‘official’ anarchism. Anarchist tactics embraced demonstrations, direct action such as industrial militancy and squatting, protest bombings like those of the First of May Group and Angry Brigade – and a spree of publishing activity.""Islands of Anarchy: Simian, Cienfuegos, Refract and their support network" by John Patten
  115. ^ "Farrell provides a detailed history of the Catholic Workers and their founders Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin. He explains that their pacifism, anarchism, and commitment to the downtrodden were one of the important models and inspirations for the 60s. As Farrell puts it, "Catholic Workers identified the issues of the sixties before the Sixties began, and they offered models of protest long before the protest decade." "The Spirit of the Sixties: The Making of Postwar Radicalism" by James J. Farrell
  116. ^ "While not always formally recognized, much of the protest of the sixties was anarchist. Within the nascent women's movement, anarchist principles became so widespread that a political science professor denounced what she saw as "The Tyranny of Structurelessness." Several groups have called themselves "Amazon Anarchists." After the Stonewall Rebellion, the New York Gay Liberation Front based their organization in part on a reading of Murray Bookchin's anarchist writings." "Anarchism" by Charley Shively in Encyclopedia of Homosexuality. p. 52
  117. ^ "Within the movements of the sixties there was much more receptivity to anarchism-in-fact than had existed in the movements of the thirties...But the movements of the sixties were driven by concerns that were more compatible with an expressive style of politics, with hostility to authority in general and state power in particular...By the late sixties, political protest was intertwined with cultural radicalism based on a critique of all authority and all hierarchies of power. Anarchism circulated within the movement along with other radical ideologies. The influence of anarchism was strongest among radical feminists, in the commune movement, and probably in the Weather Underground and elsewhere in the violent fringe of the anti-war movement." "Anarchism and the Anti-Globalization Movement" by Barbara Epstein
  118. ^ London Federation of Anarchists involvement in Carrara conference, 1968 International Institute of Social History. Retrieved 19 January 2010
  119. ^ Short history of the IAF-IFA A-infos news project. Retrieved 19 January 2010
  120. ^ McLaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority. Aldershot: Ashgate. p. 10. ISBN 0-7546-6196-2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |unused_data= ignored (help)
  121. ^ Pierce, Wayne."Libertarian Marxism's Relation to Anarchism" "The Utopian" 73-80.
  122. ^ Herman Gorter, Anton Pannekoek, Sylvia Pankhurst, Otto Ruhl Non-Leninist Marxism: Writings on the Workers Councils. Red and Black, 2007.
  123. ^ Marot, Eric. "Trotsky, the Left Opposition and the Rise of Stalinism: Theory and Practice"
  124. ^ "The Retreat of Social Democracy ... Re-imposition of Work in Britain and the 'Social Europe'" "Aufheben" Issue #8 1999.
  125. ^ Ernesto Screpanti, Libertarian communism: Marx Engels and the Political Economy of Freedom, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2007.
  126. ^ Draper, Hal. "The Principle of Self-Emancipation in Marx and Engels" "The Socialist Register." Vol 4.
  127. ^ Chomsky, Noam. "Government In The Future" Poetry Center of the New York YM-YWHA. Lecture.
  128. ^ http://libcom.org/library/libertarian-marxist-tendency-map
  129. ^ Libertarian Marxism? by Daniel Guerin
  130. ^ Henry J. Silverman, ed. (1970). American radical thought: the libertarian tradition. Lexington, Mass.: Heath and Company. p. 279. {{cite book}}: More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help) LCC JA84.U5 S55
  131. ^ Ronald Lora, William Henry Longton, (1999) Conservative press in 20th-century America, pp. 367–374, Westport CT: Greenwood Publishing Group
  132. ^ Marc Jason Gilbert, The Vietnam War on campus: other voices, more distant drums, p. 35, 2001, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 0-275-96909-6
  133. ^ Rebecca E. Klatch, A Generation Divided: The New Left, the New Right, and the 1960s, University of California Press, 1999 p. 215–237.
  134. ^ Thomas 1985, p. 4
  135. ^ Rubin, Harriet (September 15, 2007). "Ayn Rand's Literature of Capitalism". The New York Times. Retrieved September 18, 2007.
  136. ^ National Book Award: 1975 – Philosophy and Religion
  137. ^ David Lewis Schaefer, Robert Nozick and the Coast of Utopia, The New York Sun, April 30, 2008.
  138. ^ Rupert, Mark (2006). Globalization and International Political Economy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 66-68. ISBN 0-7425-2943-6.
  139. ^ The ANES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior, 1948–2004 American National Election Studies
  140. ^ Gallup Poll news release, September 7–10, 2006.
  141. ^ Beyond Liberal and Conservative Willaim S. Maddox & Stuart A. Lilie, 1984.
  142. ^ Emily Ekins, Is Half the Tea Party Libertarian?, Reason, September 26, 2011
  143. ^ Justin Raimondoo, Election 2012: Ron Paul’s Revenge!], Antiwar.com, November 7, 2012.
  144. ^ Belluck, Pam (October 27, 2003). "Libertarians Pursue New Political Goal: State of Their Own". The New York Times. Retrieved May 26, 2011. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  145. ^ Elizabeth Hovde (2009-05-11). "Americans mixed on Obama's big government gamble". The Oregonian.
  146. ^ Gairdner, William D. (2007) [1990]. The Trouble with Canada: A Citizen Speaks Out. Toronto: BPS Books. pp. 101–102. ISBN 978-0-9784402-2-0. The first, we would call "libertarianism" today. Libertarians wanted to get all government out of people's lives. This movement is still very much alive today. In fact, in the United States, it is the third largest political party, and ran 125 candidates during the U.S. election of 1988.
  147. ^ Richard Winger (March 1, 2008). "Early 2008 Registration Totals". Ballot Access News. 23 (11). San Francisco, CA: Richard Winger. Retrieved 2010-07-19.[self-published source?]
  148. ^ "Our History". Our Party. Washington, DC: Libertarian National Committee [USA]. Retrieved 2011-01-18.
  149. ^ Carley, Mark "Trade union membership 1993–2003" (International: SPIRE Associates 2004).
  150. ^ http://www.cnt-ait-fr.org/CNT-AIT/ACCUEIL.html Website of the Confédération Nationale du Travail – Association Internationale des Travailleurs

Bibliography

External links

Template:Link GA